Matrix and mnemonic text-processing adjuncts: Comparing and combining their components.

Robert K. Atkinson · Joel R. Levin · Kenneth A. Kiewra · Tom Meyers · Sung‐il Kim · Laura Ann Atkinson +2 more

38 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Educational Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes Reading and Literacy Development Memory Processes and Influences

Abstract

The comparative text-processing benefits of matrix structures, mnemonic representations, and their combination were examined in 3 experiments (1 with college students, 2 with 5th graders). The study's major findings permit the following conclusions: First, contrary to previous research on the topic,

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 38 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research 2017The Aims of Education (1929)1988Learning Disabilities Research 1995Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text.1989Knowledge Acquisition From Text and Pictures 1983Cognitive strategy research : educational applications 1983Pictorial Strategies for School Learning: Practical Illustrations 1986Four Cognitive Principles of Learning-Strategy Instruction

Cited by

2002Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students' Learning from Text 2003Do pictorial mnemonic text-learning aids give students something worth writing about?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.