Citation map · Study

Empirically Based Methods to Assess the Preferences of Individuals With Severe Disabilities

0 references·14 citing·31 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

2003A Content Analysis of the Curricular Philosophies Reflected in States' Alternate Assessment Performance Indicators56 cited
2003Passive Activities: the Effectiveness of Multisensory Environments on the Level of Activity of Individuals with Profound Multiple Disabilities55 cited
2008Non‐generalized and generalized conditioned reinforcers: establishment and validation52 cited
2003Assessing preferred work among adults with autism beginning supported jobs: identification of constant and alternating task preferences35 cited
2014A DISCRIMINATION TRAINING PROCEDURE TO ESTABLISH CONDITIONED REINFORCERS FOR CHILDREN WITH AUTISM33 cited
2005A Challenge to Self-Determination: Disagreement between the Vocational Choices Made by Individuals with Severe Disabilities and Their Caregivers29 cited
2014Comparison of high and low preferred topographies of contingent attention during discrete trial training27 cited
2000Guidelines for Conducting Socially Valid Systematic Preference Assessments27 cited
2007Identifying work preferences among supported workers with severe disabilities: efficiency and accuracy of a preference‐assessment protocol21 cited
2010Transitional Assessment Model for Students With Severe and/or Multiple Disabilities: Competency-Based Community Assessment17 cited
2012Communication with Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities and Psychiatric Disabilities: A Summary of the Literature17 cited
2007Promoting Self-Determination in Students with Developmental Disabilities. What Works for Special-Needs Learners.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work