The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost

Caroline F. Rowland · Franklin Chang · Ben Ambridge · Julián M. Pine · Elena Lieven

240 citations0/0 files storedCognition

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Language Development and Disorders Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Abstract

Structural priming paradigms have been influential in shaping theories of adult sentence processing and theories of syntactic development. However, until recently there have been few attempts to provide an integrated account that explains both adult and developmental data. The aim of the present paper was to begin the process of integration by taking a developmental approach to structural priming. Using a dialog comprehension-to-production paradigm, we primed participants (3-4year olds, 5-6year olds and adults) with double object datives (Wendy gave Bob a dog) and prepositional datives (Wendy gave a dog to Bob). Half the participants heard the same verb in prime and target (e.g. gave-gave) and half heard a different verb (e.g. sent-gave). The results revealed substantial differences in the magnitude of priming across development. First, there was a small but significant abstract structural priming effect across all age groups, but this effect was larger in younger children than in older children and adults. Second, adding verb overlap between prime and target prompted a large, significant increase in the priming effect in adults (a lexical boost), a small, marginally significant increase in the older children and no increase in the youngest children. The results support the idea that abstract syntactic knowledge can develop independently of verb-specific frames. They also support the idea that different mechanisms may be needed to explain abstract structural priming and lexical priming, as predicted by the implicit learning account (Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology - General, 129(2), 177-192). Finally, the results illustrate the value of an integrative developmental approach to both theories of adult sentence processing and theories of syntax acquisition.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 240 citations exist upstream.

References

1992A power primer.1891The Principles of Psychology 2003Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition 2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language 2004The Structure of Working Memory From 4 to 15 Years of Age.1996Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs.1991Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure 2013Learnability and Cognition

Cited by

2019Against stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition 2015When and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb bias effects in a structural priming task 2015A Constructivist Account of Child Language Acquisition 2017Differences in use without deficiencies in competence: passives in the Turkish and German of Turkish heritage speakers in Germany 2016What children learn from adults’ utterances: An ephemeral lexical boost and persistent syntactic priming in adult–child dialogue

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.