SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Is feedback pedagogically correct? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleIs feedback pedagogically correct?

Danielle Guénette2007

Article2007

Is feedback pedagogically correct?

Danielle Guénette

326 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Second Language Writing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Student Assessment and Feedback Second Language Acquisition and Learning

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 326 citations exist upstream.

References

1996The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes 1994Negative Feedback as Regulation and Second Language Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development 2003The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing 2001Error feedback in L2 writing classes 1998RECASTS, REPETITION, AND AMBIGUITY IN L2 CLASSROOM DISCOURSE 2004The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?)1990Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.2006Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching

Cited by

2008Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms 2012Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers 2009Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners 2010Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy 2010Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Insights, and Future Directions

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2011THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FEEDBACK FOR L1‐ENGLISH AND L2‐WRITING DEVELOPMENT: A META‐ANALYSISarticle · 14 shared references 2012A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CFarticle · 12 shared references 2014Learner uptake of teacher electronic feedback in ESL compositionarticle · 12 shared references 2010Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Insights, and Future Directionsarticle · 11 shared references 2010Written Corrective Feedback: The Practitioners’ Perspectivearticle · 11 shared references 2015L2 learners' interpretation and understanding of written corrective feedback: insights from their metalinguistic reflectionsarticle · 11 shared references

Details

Year2007

Typearticle

Published2007-03-01

VenueJournal of Second Language Writing

ISSN-L1060-3743

Languageen

Citations326

Files0 public / 0

ShelfEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jslw.2007.01.001

openalex_workW2146437619

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2008The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback

2015Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing

2012The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate