SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleThe nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education

Jakko van der Pol2008

OA

Articlegreen2008

The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education

Jakko van der Pol · B.A.M. van den Berg · Wilfried Admiraal · P.R.J. Simons

230 citations·0/0 files stored·Computers & Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Student Assessment and Feedback Online and Blended Learning Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 230 citations exist upstream.

References

2007The Power of Feedback 2006Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice 2004Informal learning in the workplace 2005Analyzing media messages using quantitative content analysis in research 1998Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities 2005Trends in Peer Learning 2005Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning 1999The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review

Cited by

2015Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Its Pros and Cons.2019From feedback to revisions: Effects of feedback features and perceptions 2017Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills 2011The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online learning environment 2022Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2018The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analysisreview · 7 shared references 2011Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedbackarticle · 7 shared references 2015Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratingsreview · 7 shared references 2001New lines in edumetrics: new forms of assessment lead to new assessment criteriaarticle · 7 shared references 2006Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utilitychapter · 6 shared references 2015The assessment cycle: a model for learning through peer assessmentarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2008

Typearticle

Published2008-07-28

VenueComputers & Education

ISSN-L0360-1315

Languageen

Citations230

Files0 public / 0

ShelfStudent Assessment and Feedback

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.001

openalex_workW2149915933

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2017

Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system

2020Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature

2020Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback