Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: Results of a questionnaire survey of editors

15 references·2 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2007Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method9,606 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
1997Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals243 cited
1966Statistical Evaluation of Medical Journal Manuscripts207 cited
2002Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem156 cited
1986Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies.144 cited
1990An Exploratory Study of Statistical Assessment of Papers Published in the British Medical Journal130 cited
2000How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature?126 cited
1998Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals94 cited
1992The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors87 cited
1983Is the statistical assessment of papers submitted to the "British Medical Journal" effective?47 cited
1985Statistics in medical journals: A survey of current policies and proposals for editors42 cited
1990Editorial Peer Review in US Medical Journals41 cited
2001

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Appointment of statistical editor and quality of statistics in a small medical journal.

23 cited

Cited by

2021Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial12 cited
2009Evaluating the Surgery Literature11 cited