Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability at Age 13: Their Status 20 Years Later

12 references·16 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns.2,913 cited
1995Sex Differences in Mental Test Scores, Variability, and Numbers of High-Scoring Individuals1,111 cited
1992Meta-analytic Findings on Grouping Programs391 cited
1997Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for education.367 cited
1998Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension.343 cited
1992Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities339 cited
2000Scientific and Social Significance of Assessing Individual Differences: “Sinking Shafts at a Few Critical Points”321 cited
1993Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist.293 cited
2000States of excellence.283 cited
2001Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted.270 cited
1982Consequences in High School and College of Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability: A Longitudinal Perspective227 cited
1986Mathematically Talented Males and Females and Achievement in the High School Sciences142 cited

Cited by

2007Spatial ability: A neglected dimension in talent searches for intellectually precocious youth.207 cited
2019Teachers’ Bias Against the Mathematical Ability of Female, Black, and Hispanic Students

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

194 cited

2005Creativity and Occupational Accomplishments Among Intellectually Precocious Youths: An Age 13 to Age 33 Longitudinal Study.191 cited

2006Tracking Exceptional Human Capital Over Two Decades185 cited

2014Life Paths and Accomplishments of Mathematically Precocious Males and Females Four Decades Later183 cited

2006Implicit stereotypes and women’s math performance: How implicit gender-math stereotypes influence women’s susceptibility to stereotype threat180 cited

2002An Examination of Implicitly Activated, Explicitly Activated, and Nullified Stereotypes on Mathematical Performance: It's Not Just a Woman's Issue144 cited

2010Beyond the Threshold Hypothesis139 cited

2006How Development and Personality Influence Scientific Thought, Interest, and Achievement132 cited

2002Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development.121 cited

2016From Terman to Today118 cited

2009Exploring the Relationship of College Freshmen Honors Students’ Effort and Ability Attribution, Interest, and Implicit Theory of Intelligence With Perceived Ability104 cited

2001Men and Women at Promise for Scientific Excellence: Similarity Not Dissimilarity95 cited

2015Gifted Adults94 cited

2009Exceptional Cognitive Ability: The Phenotype93 cited

2020Intellectual Precocity: What Have We Learned Since Terman?89 cited