SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Manuscript peer review: a helpful checklist for students and novice referees.
3 references·16 citing·47 second hop
Manuscript peer review: a helpful checklist for students and novice referees. (2000)Manuscript peer review: a helpful checkli…What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)What Makes a Good Reviewer an…Peer review: reform or revolution? (1997)Peer review: reform or revolu…Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review (2025)Defining quality in peer revi…A scoping review on biomedical journal peer review guides for reviewers (2021)A scoping review on biomedica…Do’s and Don’ts for a Good Reviewer of Scientific Papers: A Beginner’s Brief Decalogue (2020)Do’s and Don’ts for a Good Re…Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals (2018)Reviewing the review: a quali…Scholarly peer reviewing′: The art, its joys and woes (2015)Scholarly peer reviewing′: Th…Writing an Effective Manuscript Review: The 6 “Be's” to Success (2013)Writing an Effective Manuscri…A Checklist to Guide Graduate Students' Writing (2012)A Checklist to Guide Graduate…Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers (2010)Student peer review decisions…Manuscript peer review: A guide for advanced practice nurses (2010)Manuscript peer review: A gui…Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products (2009)Development and evaluation of…A review of the review process: manuscript peer-review in biomedical research (2009)A review of the review proces…Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants (2007)Peer review as professional r…Beyond objective and balanced: Writing constructive manuscript reviews (2006)Beyond objective and balanced…On the value of being a journal reviewer (2005)On the value of being a journ…A Guide to Reviewing Manuscripts (2005)A Guide to Reviewing Manuscri…Lista de comprobación (checklist) abreviada para la evaluación de artículos de investigación biomédica básica (2003)Lista de comprobación (checkl…Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical Journals (1988)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial (1990)Measuring the social impact of research (2001)Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference (2002)Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal (2004)Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable (1994)Social Simulation That 'Peers into Peer Review' (2011)Reviewer index: A new proposal of rewarding the reviewer (2013)On the money value of peer review (2018)Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks (2000)Collaborative learning through formative peer review: pedagogy, programs and potential (2012)Comparison of early career researchers and senior career researchers as peer reviewers: A questionnaire survey in China (2022)Use of preprint peer review to educate and enculturate science undergraduates (2022)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial (2000)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)Qualitative research and evidence based medicine (1998)Peer review in health sciences (2002)How to peer review and revise manuscripts submitted for publication in academic nursing journals (2016)Using the peer review process to educate and empower emerging nurse scholars (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study (2020)Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review (2022)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Review Article: The Flagship of Evidence-Based Medicine (2021)Alice through the Looking-glass: Can We Improve Peer Review? (2022)Reglas y consejos para ser un buen revisor por pares de manuscritos científicos (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Automated scholarly paper review: Concepts, technologies, and challenges (2023)Enhancing Pedagogic Practice: A Review of Educational Processes (2023)Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: An international cross-sectional survey (2023)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods (2005)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 1998What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?266 cited
  • 1997Peer review: reform or revolution?113 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants60 cited
  • 2021A scoping review on biomedical journal peer review guides for reviewers38 cited
  • 2025Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review24 cited
  • 2010Manuscript peer review: A guide for advanced practice nurses23 cited
  • 2018Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals22 cited
  • 2010Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers20 cited
  • 2020Do’s and Don’ts for a Good Reviewer of Scientific Papers: A Beginner’s Brief Decalogue20 cited
  • 2006Beyond objective and balanced: Writing constructive manuscript reviews19 cited
  • 2005A Guide to Reviewing Manuscripts18 cited
  • 2009A review of the review process: manuscript peer-review in biomedical research18 cited
  • 2009Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

18 cited
  • 2012A Checklist to Guide Graduate Students' Writing16 cited
  • 2005On the value of being a journal reviewer16 cited
  • 2015Scholarly peer reviewing′: The art, its joys and woes13 cited
  • 2003Lista de comprobación (checklist) abreviada para la evaluación de artículos de investigación biomédica básica12 cited
  • 2013Writing an Effective Manuscript Review: The 6 “Be's” to Success12 cited