Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A Critical Appraisal of Standard Guidelines for Grading Levels of Evidence

16 references·4 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory5,107 cited
2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies3,791 cited
2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
2004The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods1,337 cited
1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
1998Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods1,170 cited
2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
1990Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research.782 cited
2011Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials439 cited
1998Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review.334 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1994

Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine

324 cited

2000A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.311 cited

Cited by

2013Defiance and Motivational Postures23 cited
2016A Critical Review of Grading Systems: Implications for Public Health Policy20 cited
2012An Application of a New Evidence Grading System to Research on the Chronic Care Model15 cited
2014Hierarchy of evidence and appraisal of limitations (HEAL) grading system14 cited