The self: Your own worst enemy? A test of the self-invoking trigger hypothesis

Brad McKay · Gabriele Wulf · Rebecca Lewthwaite · Andrew D. Nordin

66 citations0/0 files storedQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Sport Psychology and Performance Motor Control and Adaptation Sports and Physical Education Research

Abstract

The self-invoking trigger hypothesis was proposed by Wulf and Lewthwaite [Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Effortless motor learning? An external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency. In B. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in attention and action (pp. 75-101). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press] as a mechanism underlying the robust effect of attentional focus on motor learning and performance. One component of this hypothesis, relevant beyond the attentional focus effect, suggests that causing individuals to access their self-schema will negatively impact their learning and performance of a motor skill. The purpose of the present two studies was to provide an initial test of the performance and learning aspects of the self-invoking trigger hypothesis by asking participants in one group to think about themselves between trial blocks-presumably activating their self-schema-to compare their performance and learning to that of a control group. In Experiment 1, participants performed 2 blocks of 10 trials on a throwing task. In one condition, participants were asked between blocks to think about their past throwing experience. While a control group maintained their performance across blocks, the self group's performance was degraded on the second block. In Experiment 2, participants were asked to practice a wiffleball hitting task on two separate days. Participants returned on a third day to perform retention and transfer tests without the self-activating manipulation. Results indicated that the self group learned the hitting task less effectively than the control group. The findings reported here provide initial support for the self-invoking trigger hypothesis.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 66 citations exist upstream.

References

1977Self-schemata and processing information about the self.2006Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self 1984Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance.2004Cortical midline structures and the self 2012Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 years 2001On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure?1992Knowledge, knerves and know‐how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure 2001The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus

Cited by

2016Dual-process theories and consciousness: the case for ‘Type Zero’ cognition: Table 1.2016Coaching cues in amateur boxing: An analysis of ringside feedback provided between rounds of competition 2020The distance effect and level of expertise: Is the optimal external focus different for low-skilled and high-skilled performers?2018Enhancing performance expectancies through positive comparative feedback facilitates the learning of basketball free throw in children

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.