Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluative language in discussion sections of doctoral theses: Similarities and differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English writers

16 references·16 citing·41 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English2,892 cited
1998Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach2,615 cited
2005Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse2,009 cited
2004Research Genres: Explorations and Applications1,682 cited
2006Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book1,172 cited
2022Corpora in Applied Linguistics930 cited
2006Stance in spoken and written university registers634 cited
2019Statistics for Corpus Linguistics546 cited
1997Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students' writing533 cited
2004Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline?430 cited
2011Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals411 cited
2005Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section352 cited
2010Metadiscourse: Mapping Interactions in Academic Writing278 cited
1999The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D theses216 cited
2004The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

186 cited

1997Indirectness in L1 and L2 academic writing169 cited

Cited by

2019Differences in engagement: A comparison of the strategies used by British and Chinese research article writers76 cited
2020Direct and indirect data-driven learning: An experimental study of hedging in an EFL writing class54 cited
2020Engagement in doctoral dissertation discussion sections written by English native speakers43 cited
2018APPRAISAL resources in L1 and L2 argumentative essays: A contrastive learner corpus-informed study of evaluative stance38 cited
2018Authorial voice constructed in citation in literature reviews of doctoral theses: Variations across training contexts38 cited
2022“The findings might not be generalizable”: Investigating negation in the limitations sections of PhD theses across disciplines35 cited
2019How do thesis writers evaluate their own and others’ findings? An appraisal analysis and a pedagogical intervention34 cited
2019How does China appraise self and others? A corpus-based analysis of Chinese political discourse33 cited
2018Chinese graduate students paraphrasing in English and Chinese contexts31 cited
2018Dynamic Lexical Features of PhD Theses across Disciplines: A Text Mining Approach27 cited
2018A Multidimensional Analysis of Research Article Discussion Sections in the Field of Chemical Engineering26 cited
2019Scaffolding L2 writers’ metacognitive awareness of voice in article reviews: A case study of SFL-based pedagogy25 cited
2017“New opportunities” and “Strong performance”: Evaluative adjectives in letters to shareholders and potential for pedagogically-downsized specialized corpora23 cited
2023A diachronic study of authorial stance in the discussion of Chinese MA theses and published research articles23 cited
2023The different ways to write publishable research articles: Using cluster analysis to uncover patterns of APPRAISAL in discussions across disciplines22 cited
2020Institutional self-promotion: a comparative study of appraisal resources used by top- and second-tier universities in China and America22 cited