Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Comparing the OPI and the OPIc: The Effect of Test Method on Oral Proficiency Scores and Student Preference

5 references·4 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines and the Oral Proficiency Interview: A Brief History and Analysis of Their Survival124 cited
2001COMPARING EXAMINEE ATTITUDES TOWARD COMPUTER- ASSISTED AND OTHER ORAL PROFICIENCY ASSESSMENTS62 cited
2005Self-assessment, preparation and response time on a computerized oral proficiency test50 cited
2003The Oral Proficiency Interview: A Research Agenda47 cited
2003Reliability and the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview: Reporting Indices of Interrater Consistency and Agreement for 19 Languages46 cited

Cited by

2019ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview – computer (OPIc)29 cited
2018Using the ACTFL OPIc to assess proficiency and monitor progress in a tertiary foreign languages program27 cited
2018Exploring the Relationship Between Self-Assessments and OPIc Ratings of Oral Proficiency in French20 cited
2021Heritage Language Assessment3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work