CRITERIA USED BY VENTURE CAPITALISTS

Russell M. Knight

39 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Private Equity and Venture Capital Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences Community Development and Social Impact

Abstract

This paper describes a survey of Canadian venture-capital firms and small-business development corporations to investigate the criteria they use to evaluate venture proposals. The criteria were taken from U.S. survey of venture-capital firms and the results are contrasted with U.S. responses.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.

References

2011Journal of Business Venturing

Cited by

2004Characteristics, Contracts, and Actions: Evidence from Venture Capitalist Analyses 1987Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process 1994The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on new venture performance and strategy content 20047. Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation 2006Are UK technology-based small firms still finance constrained?2021VC investors’ venture screening: the role of the decision maker’s education and experience 2008Trust and Success in Venture Capital Financing - An Empirical Analysis with German Survey Data 1989Spatial Patterns of Canadian Venture Capital Investment

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.