Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Impossibility of Textualism and the Pervasiveness of Rewriting in Law

15 references·2 citing·29 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1983Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities3,647 cited
1989Doing What Comes Naturally727 cited
1998A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law442 cited
1994There's no such thing as free speech: and it's a good thing, too355 cited
2006Law as a Means to an End255 cited
1985Against theory : literary studies and the new pragmatism217 cited
1981Whigs and Hunters216 cited
2005The Rise and Fall of Textualism76 cited
1979Literal meaning62 cited
2016What Divides Textualists from Purposivists?55 cited
2004"Is That English You're Speaking?" Why Intention Free Interpretation is an Impossibility48 cited
2005There is No Textualist Position39 cited
2004Postmodern sophistry: Stanley Fish and the critical enterprise23 cited
2005Not a Matter of Interpretation22 cited
1979Against Formalism: The Autonomous Text in Legal and Literary Interpretation22 cited

Cited by

2021Creating law of interpretation: a risky or fundamental step?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

8 cited

2022Prawo interpretacyjne7 cited