Citation map · Study

Good practice or positive action? Using Q methodology to identify competing views on improving gender equality in academic medicine

16 references·6 citing·47 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2007Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?2,524 cited
1995Rethinking Methods in Psychology1,921 cited
2011poLCA : An R Package for Polytomous Variable Latent Class Analysis1,647 cited
1993A Primer on Q Methodology1,193 cited
2010The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations792 cited
2011Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs593 cited
2000Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change11We are grateful to Lotte Bailyn and our colleagues affiliated with the Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons Graduate School of Management – Gill Coleman, Joyce Fletcher, Deborah Kolb, Deborah Merrill-Sands, Rhona Rapoport, and Bridgette Sheridan – for their contributions to these ideas and for their foundational research, on which this paper builds. We also appreciate the feedback we received on an earlier draft from members of the FSC Research Group, Elaine Backman, Herminia Ibarra, Maureen Scully, and Kathleen Valley. We thank Joanne Martin and Barbara Reskin for their comments, which helped in our conceptual framing of the paper. Finally, we thank Bob Sutton and Barry Staw for their helpful suggestions. This research was funded in part by the Ford Foundation.560 cited
2009The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology546 cited
2011Is There Still a Glass Ceiling for Women in Academic Surgery?513 cited
2012Experiencing the Culture of Academic Medicine: Gender Matters, A National Study266 cited
1996Fixing the leaky pipeline: women scientists in academia.238 cited
1995

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by