Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Does Reason Writing Reduce Decision Bias? Experimental Evidence from Judges in China

11 references·6 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1991Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.1,417 cited
2013Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection1,300 cited
1984Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment.741 cited
1993Introspecting about Reasons can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction612 cited
2000Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect: Considering the Opposite Compensates for Selective Accessibility557 cited
2005Playing Dice With Criminal Sentences: The Influence of Irrelevant Anchors on Experts’ Judicial Decision Making553 cited
1997Exposition Effects on Decision Making: Choice and Confidence in Choice225 cited
2016Justice Is Less Blind, and Less Legalistic, than We Thought: Evidence from an Experiment with Real Judges87 cited
1995The Rhetoric of Results and the Results of Rhetoric: Judicial Writings82 cited
1995Judges' Writing Styles (And Do They Matter?)81 cited
2000When does explicit justification impair decision making?73 cited

Cited by

2019Legal Techniques for Rationalizing Biased Judicial Decisions: Evidence from Experiments with Real Judges57 cited
2022Outcome effects, moral luck and the hindsight bias41 cited
2022Ethnic Bias in Judicial Decision Making: Evidence from Criminal Appeals in Kenya

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

37 cited

2021Outcome Effects, Moral Luck and the Hindsight Bias6 cited

2022Judicial Decision-Making. A Survey of the Experimental Evidence6 cited

2024Experiments2 cited