SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Who’s on Top? Gender Differences in Risk-Taking Produce Unequal Outcomes for High-Ability Women and Men
16 references·2 citing·35 second hop
Who’s on Top? Gender Differences in Risk-Taking Produce Unequal Outcomes for High-Ability Women and Men (2018)Who’s on Top? Gender Differences in Risk-…Gender Differences in Preferences (2009)Gender Differences in Prefere…Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives (2006)Organizations and Organizing:…Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations (2004)Constraints into Preferences:…What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't be, are Allowed to be, and don't Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes (2002)What Women and Men Should Be,…Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects (2002)Risk Aversion and Incentive E…Risk as feelings. (2001)Risk as feelings.Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. (1999)Gender differences in risk ta…ARE WOMEN MORE RISK AVERSE? (1998)ARE WOMEN MORE RISK AVERSE?How Believing in Ourselves Increases Risk Taking: Perceived Self-Efficacy and Opportunity Recognition (1994)How Believing in Ourselves In…Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (1993)Risk Society: Towards a New M…Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking (1990)Edgework: A Social Psychologi…Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory (1979)Attribution of success and fa…Men and Women of the Corporation (1978)Men and Women of the Corporat…The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Matthew effect in science…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in ScienceAspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing. (1966)Aspects of the Theory of Risk…MANI-Rank: Multiple Attribute and Intersectional Group Fairness for Consensus Ranking (2022)MANI-Rank: Multiple Attribute…Gender disparities in fear of failure among 15‐year‐old students: The role of gender inequality, the organisation of schooling and economic conditions (2020)Gender disparities in fear of…Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)The Scientific Community. (1966)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)A power primer. (1992)Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making (2005)The descent of man and selection in relation to sex (1907)Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921)A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation (1999)Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much? (2007)What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World? (2007)Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆ (2009)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. (2003)Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics (2003)Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large (1964)Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large (1976)Oxytocin increases trust in humans (2005)INDIVIDUAL RISK ATTITUDES: MEASUREMENT, DETERMINANTS, AND BEHAVIORAL CONSEQUENCES (2011)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case (1969)On the measurement of inequality (1970)Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. (2002)The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and Firm Financial Performance (2010)The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation (2010)Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment (2001)Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance (2007)The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government (1996)Deliberative Democracy and Beyond (2002)Developing a framework for responsible innovation (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1993Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity9,217 cited
  • 1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
  • 1978Men and Women of the Corporation6,352 cited
  • 2002Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects5,973 cited
  • 2001Risk as feelings.5,949 cited
  • 2009Gender Differences in Preferences5,780 cited
  • 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
  • 1999Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis.3,721 cited
  • 1966Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing.1,888 cited
  • 1998ARE WOMEN MORE RISK AVERSE?1,730 cited
  • 2002What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't be, are Allowed to be, and don't Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes1,500 cited
  • 1990Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking1,237 cited
  • 1979Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory1,136 cited
  • 2006Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives1,077 cited
  • 1994How Believing in Ourselves Increases Risk Taking: Perceived Self-Efficacy and Opportunity Recognition975 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2004Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations935 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Gender disparities in fear of failure among 15‐year‐old students: The role of gender inequality, the organisation of schooling and economic conditions43 cited
    • 2022MANI-Rank: Multiple Attribute and Intersectional Group Fairness for Consensus Ranking14 cited