Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Level and Prevalence of Spin in Published Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trial Reports With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes

15 references·16 citing·52 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
2002Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed833 cited
2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
2006Qualitative Analysis of Mothers' Decision-Making About Vaccines for Infants: The Importance of Trust608 cited
2009Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence600 cited
2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research514 cited
2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
2014Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention471 cited
2017‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review314 cited
2011Target the fence-sitters218 cited
1995

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The rhetoric of research

131 cited

2007"Spin" in scientific writing: scientific mischief and legal jeopardy.82 cited

Cited by

2020Peer Review Matters: Research Quality and the Public Trust60 cited
2022Ten simple rules for good research practice47 cited
2021The presence and characteristics of ‘spin’ among randomized controlled trial abstracts in orthodontics45 cited
2022Analysis of 567,758 randomized controlled trials published over 30 years reveals trends in phrases used to discuss results that do not reach statistical significance43 cited
2021Misleading Reporting (Spin) in Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trials in Oncology With Statistically Not Significant Results36 cited
2019The SSSPIN study—spin in studies of spin: meta-research analysis30 cited
2020Spin in the abstracts of randomized controlled trials in periodontology and oral implantology: A cross‐sectional analysis28 cited
2020Safeguarding anaesthesia research from spin26 cited
2020Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: Cross-Sectional Analysis25 cited
2023Spin and fragility in randomised controlled trials in the anaesthesia literature: a systematic review20 cited
2021Spin occurs in bariatric surgery randomized controlled trials with a statistically nonsignificant primary outcome: A systematic review17 cited
2021Abstracts for reports of randomized trials of COVID-19 interventions had low quality and high spin16 cited
2021Analysis of spin in vascular surgery randomized controlled trials with nonsignificant outcomes15 cited
2022Project Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB): a method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients.15 cited
2022Spin in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Operative Dentistry: A Cross-sectional Analysis14 cited
2024Narrative bias (“spin”) is common in randomised trials and systematic reviews of cannabinoids for pain14 cited