SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Dual-anonymization Yields Promising Results for Reducing Gender Bias: A Naturalistic Field Experiment of Applications for Hubble Space Telescope Time
16 references·6 citing·46 second hop
Dual-anonymization Yields Promising Results for Reducing Gender Bias: A Naturalistic Field Experiment of Applications for Hubble Space Telescope Time (2020)Dual-anonymization Yields Promising Resul…Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency (2019)Are gender gaps due to evalua…Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping Review (2017)Strategies to Prevent or Redu…Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts (2017)Quantitative evaluation of ge…Maximizing the Gains and Minimizing the Pains of Diversity (2015)Maximizing the Gains and Mini…The Matilda Effect in Science Communication (2013)The Matilda Effect in Science…Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap (2013)Inequality quantified: Mind t…Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Bibliometrics: Global gender …Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Science faculty’s subtle gend…Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India (2012)Female Leadership Raises Aspi…Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)Understanding current causes …Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs (2011)Sex Differences in Applicatio…The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications (2008)The Gender Gap in NIH Grant A…Interpreting dummy variables and their interaction effects in strategy research (2007)Interpreting dummy variables …Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians (2000)Orchestrating Impartiality: T…Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (2000)Multilevel Theory, Research, …Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. (1992)Gender and the evaluation of …Blinding reduces institutional prestige bias during initial review of applications for a young investigator award (2024)Blinding reduces institutiona…Update on the Systematics in the ALMA Proposal Review Process After Cycle 8 (2022)Update on the Systematics in …Triple-blind review as a solution to gender bias in academic publishing, a theoretical approach (2022)Triple-blind review as a solu…Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review? (2022)Transparency versus anonymity…Gender, Race, and Leadership (2021)Gender, Race, and LeadershipBlind Justice: Algorithmically Masking Race in Charging Decisions (2021)Blind Justice: Algorithmicall…Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective (2001)Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. (2002)Sex Differences in Social Behavior (2013)The Roots of Gender Inequality in Developing Countries (2015)Field Experiments on Discrimination (2016)A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. (2019)Review of personality and social psychology (1980)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. (1996)Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. (1998)Gender stereotypes and workplace bias (2012)The Economics of Discrimination. (1972)Analysis of Panel Data (2003)Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination (2003)Networks in the Modern Economy: Mexican Migrants in the U. S. Labor Market (2003)THE THEORY OF DISCRIMINATION (2015)The Economics of Privacy (2016)Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences (2006)Science of science (2018)Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health (2019)Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines (2020)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. (2009)Why so Few Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (2010)Gender Similarities and Differences (2013)Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions (2016)The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (2018)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)A Goal Congruity Model of Role Entry, Engagement, and Exit: Understanding Communal Goal Processes in STEM Gender Gaps (2016)Gender bias in scholarly peer review (2017)Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. (1982)Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences (1997)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Physicians and Implicit Bias: How Doctors May Unwittingly Perpetuate Health Care Disparities (2013)Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? (2016)Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers (2004)Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas (2022)Socioeconomic roots of academic faculty (2022)The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion and its Influence on Group Behavior (2002)THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES, AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY. (2004)CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META‐ANALYSIS OF PERSON–JOB, PERSON–ORGANIZATION, PERSON–GROUP, AND PERSON–SUPERVISOR FIT (2005)The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity (2019)In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity (2020)Intersectional inequalities in science (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions4,907 cited
  • 2012Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students3,139 cited
  • 2000Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians1,758 cited
  • 1992Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis.1,668 cited
  • 2013Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science1,496 cited
  • 2012Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India1,207 cited
  • 2011Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science1,116 cited
  • 2019Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency570 cited
  • 2013The Matilda Effect in Science Communication469 cited
  • 2017Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts400 cited
  • 2013Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap397 cited
  • 2008The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications272 cited
  • 2011Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs239 cited
  • 2015Maximizing the Gains and Minimizing the Pains of Diversity221 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007
Interpreting dummy variables and their interaction effects in strategy research
122 cited
  • 2017Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping Review66 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Blind Justice: Algorithmically Masking Race in Charging Decisions26 cited
    • 2021Gender, Race, and Leadership18 cited
    • 2022Triple-blind review as a solution to gender bias in academic publishing, a theoretical approach17 cited
    • 2024Blinding reduces institutional prestige bias during initial review of applications for a young investigator award11 cited
    • 2022Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?9 cited
    • 2022Update on the Systematics in the ALMA Proposal Review Process After Cycle 87 cited