SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
“This work is antithetical to the spirit of research”: An anatomy of harsh peer reviews
16 references·12 citing·32 second hop
“This work is antithetical to the spirit of research”: An anatomy of harsh peer reviews (2020)“This work is antithetical to the spirit …Metadiscourse : Exploring Interaction in Writing (2018)Metadiscourse : Exploring Int…Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar (2013)Halliday's Introduction to Fu…Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)Peer review in a changing wor…Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world (2007)Seeking acceptance in an Engl…Textual Patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education (2006)Textual Patterns: Key words a…Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing (2006)Metadiscourse: Exploring Inte…Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (2006)Feedback in Second Language W…The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English (2005)The Language of Evaluation: A…Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse (2005)Stance and engagement: a mode…Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus (2001)Word Frequencies in Written a…Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (2000)Longman Grammar of Spoken and…Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (1999)Research Methodology: A Step-…The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Sociology of Science: The…The Normative Structure of Science (1973)The Normative Structure of Sc…Reviewing is caring! Revaluing a critical, but invisibilized, underappreciated, and exploited academic practice (2025)Reviewing is caring! Revaluin…English native-speakerism in the phenomenon of reviewer 2: implications for qualitative research (2025)English native-speakerism in …Re-viewing Peer Reviewing: Towards an Affirmative Scholarship (2023)Re-viewing Peer Reviewing: To…Interaction in written texts: A bibliometric study of published research (2023)Interaction in written texts:…‘The study has clear limitations’: Presentation of limitations in conclusion sections of PhD dissertations and research articles in applied linguistics (2023)‘The study has clear limitati…Reining in Reviewer Two: How to Uphold Epistemic Respect in Academia (2022)Reining in Reviewer Two: How …COVID‐19 in the news: The first 12 months (2022)COVID‐19 in the news: The fir…Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers (2022)Characteristics of ‘mega’ pee…Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers’ confidential comments to editors (2021)Transparency in peer review: …The scholarly publishing landscape (2021)The scholarly publishing land…Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review (2021)Re-evaluation of solutions to…Don’t be reviewer 2! Reflections on writing effective peer review comments (2021)Don’t be reviewer 2! Reflecti…Language as social semiotic : the social interpretation of language and meaning (1978)Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage (1987)Reading images: the grammar of visual design (1996)Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective (2009)Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science (2010)Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond (2014)Introduction to functional grammar . By M. A. K. Halliday London & Baltimore: Edward Arnold, 1985. Pp. xxxv, 387. (1989)An introduction to functional grammar . 2nd edn. By M. A. K. Halliday London, Melbourne, & Auckland: Edward Arnold, 1994. Pp. XXXV, 434. (1995)As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation (2007)Register, Genre, and Style (2009)Register, Genre, and Style (2019)The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse (2007)Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals (2011)Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing (2014)How to research (2010)International Focus Group Research: A Handbook for the Health and Social Sciences (2010)Importance–performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers (2014)FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING (2002)From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition (2006)The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (2012)Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay (1984)Intersectionality as buzzword (2008)Why We Disagree about Climate Change (2009)The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm (2000)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (2021)Scientific peer review (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)The Culture of Singapore English (2014)Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present (2014)Borders, Fences, and Limits—Protecting Austria From Refugees: Metadiscursive Negotiation of Meaning in the Current Refugee Crisis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English8,193 cited
  • 1974The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations4,004 cited
  • 1999Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners3,454 cited
  • 2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English2,892 cited
  • 2013Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar2,092 cited
  • 2005Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse2,009 cited
  • 1973The Normative Structure of Science1,623 cited
  • 2006Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing1,226 cited
  • 2018Metadiscourse : Exploring Interaction in Writing887 cited
  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
  • 2001Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus723 cited
  • 2006Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues576 cited
  • 2012Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers393 cited
  • 2007Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world364 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2006Textual Patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education329 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Don’t be reviewer 2! Reflections on writing effective peer review comments45 cited
    • 2022Reining in Reviewer Two: How to Uphold Epistemic Respect in Academia32 cited
    • 2023‘The study has clear limitations’: Presentation of limitations in conclusion sections of PhD dissertations and research articles in applied linguistics29 cited
    • 2022COVID‐19 in the news: The first 12 months23 cited
    • 2021Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers’ confidential comments to editors21 cited
    • 2023Interaction in written texts: A bibliometric study of published research20 cited
    • 2022Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers18 cited
    • 2021Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review17 cited
    • 2021The scholarly publishing landscape13 cited
    • 2023Re-viewing Peer Reviewing: Towards an Affirmative Scholarship12 cited
    • 2025Reviewing is caring! Revaluing a critical, but invisibilized, underappreciated, and exploited academic practice9 cited
    • 2025English native-speakerism in the phenomenon of reviewer 2: implications for qualitative research3 cited