SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Study of the Practices and Responsibilities of Scholarly Peer Review in Rhetoric and Composition
15 references·0 citing·31 second hop
A Study of the Practices and Responsibilities of Scholarly Peer Review in Rhetoric and Composition (2019)A Study of the Practices and Responsibili…Preparing Graduate Students for Academic Publishing (2018)Preparing Graduate Students f…How to peer review and revise manuscripts submitted for publication in academic nursing journals (2016)How to peer review and revise…Peer review motivation frames: A qualitative approach (2015)Peer review motivation frames…Navigating the Peer-Review Process: Reviewers’ Suggestions for a Manuscript (2015)Navigating the Peer-Review Pr…Working with Faculty Writers (2013)Working with Faculty WritersWhat We Really Value: Redefining Scholarly Engagement in Tenure and Promotion Protocols (2013)What We Really Value: Redefin…11 Guiding Principles for Supporting Faculty as Writers at a Teaching-Mission Institution (2013)11 Guiding Principles for Sup…Peer Review in the Tenure and Promotion Process. (2012)Peer Review in the Tenure and…Methodologies of Peer and Editorial Review: Changing Practices. (2012)Methodologies of Peer and Edi…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewToward Graduate-Level Writing Instruction (2011)Toward Graduate-Level Writing…The Power and the Perils of Peer Review. (1995)The Power and the Perils of P…The Case for Reviewing as Collaboration and Response (1995)The Case for Reviewing as Col…Improving manuscript evaluation procedures. (1972)Improving manuscript evaluati…Journal reviewing practices: Authors' and APA members' suggestions for revision. (1970)Journal reviewing practices: …Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)The achievement motive (1953)The Achievement Motive. (1954)Publication problems in psychology and an explicit evaluation schema for manuscripts. (1973)Publish or Politic: Referee Bias in Manuscript Review1 (1975)Distinction, achievement, and editorial board membership. (1976)The Academic Marketplace (2017)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment (2018)Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review (2020)Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions (2020)Improving Executive Decisions by Formalizing Dissent: The Corporate Devil's Advocate (1977)A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study (1982)Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics (1982)Professionalizing Peer Review Suggestions for a More Ethical and Pedagogical Review Process (2019)Reading Born-Digital Scholarship: A Study of Webtext User Experience (2020)“Everyone Thinks It’s Just Me”: Exploring the Emotional Dimensions of Seeking Publication (2020)Research Writing, What Do We Know and How to Move Forward (2022)Graduate Writing Across the Disciplines, Introduction (2015)Developing an English for Academic Purposes Course for L2 Graduate Students in the Sciences (2020)Graduate Writing Across the Disciplines: Identifying, Teaching, and Supporting (2020)Demarcating Medicine's Boundaries: Constituting and Categorizing in the Journals of the American Medical Association (2012)The epistemic, ethical, and political dimensions of uncertainty in integrated assessment modeling (2016)Caseloads in forensic anthropology (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 1972Improving manuscript evaluation procedures.159 cited
  • 1970Journal reviewing practices: Authors' and APA members' suggestions for revision.98 cited
  • 2011Toward Graduate-Level Writing Instruction94 cited
  • 2013Working with Faculty Writers61 cited
  • 2015Peer review motivation frames: A qualitative approach57 cited
  • 1995The Power and the Perils of Peer Review.56 cited
  • 2013What We Really Value: Redefining Scholarly Engagement in Tenure and Promotion Protocols25 cited
  • 2012Peer Review in the Tenure and Promotion Process.14 cited
  • 2012Methodologies of Peer and Editorial Review: Changing Practices.14 cited
  • 2018Preparing Graduate Students for Academic Publishing12 cited
  • 2015Navigating the Peer-Review Process: Reviewers’ Suggestions for a Manuscript10 cited
  • 201311 Guiding Principles for Supporting Faculty as Writers at a Teaching-Mission Institution9 cited
  • 2016How to peer review and revise manuscripts submitted for publication in academic nursing journals9 cited
  • 1995The Case for Reviewing as Collaboration and Response8 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.