“Burnt by the spotlight”: How leadership endorsements impact the longevity of female leaders.

Priyanka Dwivedi · Vilmos F. Misangyi · Aparna Joshi

43 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Gender Diversity and Inequality Gender Politics and Representation Media, Gender, and Advertising

Abstract

Women entering leadership positions such as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) role face barriers in the form of pervasive stereotypic expectations by which stakeholders implicitly evaluate their effectiveness. In this study, we examine the effects that a widely used organizational practice-leadership endorsements in the CEO succession announcement-has on female CEOs' longevity in the CEO role. In particular, we theorize that the leadership endorsements of incoming female CEOs that highlight their past achievements and competence violate stakeholders' prescriptive stereotypes, thereby increasing the likelihood of stakeholders viewing the female leaders through a stereotypical lens. Therefore, though well intentioned, leadership endorsements in female CEOs' succession announcements foment a stereotype threat situation that is likely to have long-term negative consequences for female leaders. We investigate and find support for this relationship using archival data for a sample of 91 female CEO successions among S&P 1500 and Fortune 500 firms between 1995 and 2012. Several post hoc analyses, including in-depth interviews with 31 female executives, further strengthen our findings and show that this effect does not occur among male CEO succession events. We also find that two key facets of the succession context work to ameliorate this negative relationship: the insider status of the female CEO and the number of female executives at the focal firm. Our findings suggest that ostensibly gender-neutral practices can have unintended negative consequences for female leaders. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of our findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 43 citations exist upstream.

References

1985Naturalistic inquiry 1995Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.2002Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.1998Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises 2006Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis 1997A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.1978Men and Women of the Corporation 2005Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses

Cited by

2022Women in the C-Suite: A Review of Predictors, Experiences, and Outcomes 2024Female leadership: An integrative review and research framework 2023Tick Off the Gender Diversity Box: Examining the Cross-Level Effects of Women’s Representation in Senior Management 2022A New Perspective on Gender Bias in the Upper Echelons: Why Stakeholder Variability Matters 2025Progressing gender equity in senior leadership: a systematic literature review

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.