SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Inside the Juror: The Psychology of Juror Decision Making
0 references·16 citing·57 second hopsampled
Inside the Juror: The Psychology of Juror Decision Making (1994)Inside the Juror: The Psychology of Juror…Rehabilitating Statistical Evidence (2019)Rehabilitating Statistical Ev…Jurors’ perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility (2018)Jurors’ perceptions of forens…I’m multimodal, aren’t you? How ego-centric anchoring biases experts’ perceptions of travel patterns (2017)I’m multimodal, aren’t you? H…‘Telling tales’: exploring narratives of life and law within the (mock) jury room (2014)‘Telling tales’: exploring na…What Does 'Clean' Really Mean? The Implicit Framing of Decontextualized Experiments (2013)What Does 'Clean' Really Mean…Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias (2012)Disfluency disrupts the confi…From perception to action: An economic model of brain processes (2011)From perception to action: An…The promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation (2010)The promise of a cognitive pe…5 Judges as Members of Small Groups (2010)5 Judges as Members of Small …3 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning (2010)3 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mode…1 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry (2010)1 Motivation and Judicial Beh…Psychological mediators of the effects of opposing expert testimony on juror decisions. (2009)Psychological mediators of th…On measuring quantitative interpretations of reasonable doubt. (2008)On measuring quantitative int…How a “Reasonable Doubt” Instruction Affects Decisions of Guilt (2007)How a “Reasonable Doubt” Inst…The Effect of Payoff Feedback and Information Pooling on Reasoning Errors: Evidence from Experimental Markets (2005)The Effect of Payoff Feedback…Evidence as a multi-disciplinary subject (2003)Evidence as a multi-disciplin…The American Jury. (1967)The American Jury (1971)Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. (2001)Legal Reasoning (2012)Individual versus group decision making: Jurors’ reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony (2017)Juror Decision Making in Acquaintance and Marital Rape: The Influence of Clothing, Alcohol, and Preexisting Stereotypical Attitudes (2018)The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? (1999)Perception problems of the verbal scale: A reanalysis and application of a membership function approach (2015)Quantification (2019)The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Semantics and Pragmatics (2019)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. (1992)Stimulus Sampling and Social Psychological Experimentation (1999)Observing Court Responses to Victims of Rape and Sexual Assault (2012)Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors’ application of instructions. (2017)On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task (1960)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Serious Efforts at Bias Reduction (2016)Morality in the time of cognitive famine: The effects of memory load on cooperation and honesty (2022)Biased belief updating in depression (2023)The Probable and The Provable (1977)The Idea Of An Overlapping Consensus (1987)An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence (1999)Evidenzbasierte Pädagogik – ein Déjà-vu? (2011)Supply chain management research impact: an evidence‐based perspective (2013)Reconsidering the ‘idea’ of evidence in evidence-based policy and practice (2015)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Mental Models (1983)Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment (2001)Risking Your Life without a Second Thought: Intuitive Decision-Making and Extreme Altruism (2014)An Integrative Theory of Action: The Model of Frame Selection (2015)The Collective Benefits of Feeling Good and Letting Go: Positive Emotion and (dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior (2015)Review of personality and social psychology (1980)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)Eye of the beholder: Effects of perspective and sexual objectification on harassment judgments. (2012)Do scores from risk measures matter to jurors? (2013)Handbook of Social Psychology (2013)Secondary confessions: The influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors’ perceptions of informant testimony. (2014)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)Considering the consequences of increased reliance on judicial assistants: a study on Dutch courts (2014)Evaluating the Effect of Law Clerk Gender on Voting at the United States Supreme Court (2016)Judges, ‘common sense’ and judicial cognition (2016)Phenomenological research methods (1994)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Exploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy framework (2020)Inconclusives and error rates in forensic science: a signal detection theory approach (2021)Human Factors in Forensic Science (2023)Knowledge and Its Limits (2000)Knowledge and Lotteries (2003)Without Justification (2007)Recent work on the proof paradox (2020)Idealization in Epistemology (2023)The Philosophy of Legal Proof (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2012Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias152 cited
  • 2008On measuring quantitative interpretations of reasonable doubt.81 cited
  • 2013What Does 'Clean' Really Mean? The Implicit Framing of Decontextualized Experiments76 cited
  • 2010The promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation62 cited
  • 2019Rehabilitating Statistical Evidence50 cited
  • 2007How a “Reasonable Doubt” Instruction Affects Decisions of Guilt46 cited
  • 2009Psychological mediators of the effects of opposing expert testimony on juror decisions.42 cited
  • 2018Jurors’ perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility38 cited
  • 2003Evidence as a multi-disciplinary subject37 cited
  • 20105 Judges as Members of Small Groups36 cited
  • 2017I’m multimodal, aren’t you? How ego-centric anchoring biases experts’ perceptions of travel patterns33 cited
  • 20101 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry29 cited
  • 2005The Effect of Payoff Feedback and Information Pooling on Reasoning Errors: Evidence from Experimental Markets27 cited
  • 20103 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning22 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2011From perception to action: An economic model of brain processes21 cited
  • 2014‘Telling tales’: exploring narratives of life and law within the (mock) jury room21 cited