Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Can Cross-National/Cultural Studies Presume Etic Equivalency in Respondents' Use of Extreme Categories of Likert Rating Scales?

16 references·3 citing·50 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2018Culture's Consequences5,505 cited
1991Measurement and Control of Response Bias3,735 cited
1986International dimensions of organizational behavior3,125 cited
2001Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation1,262 cited
2005The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles661 cited
2000Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling584 cited
2004Product-, Corporate-, and Country-Image Dimensions and Purchase Behavior: A Multicountry Analysis491 cited
2004Response Styles in Rating Scales466 cited
1997The Likert Scale Revisited417 cited
1992Measuring Extreme Response Style368 cited
2004Service Quality Perceptions and Customer Satisfaction: Evaluating the Role of Culture286 cited
2005Designing a Formative Measure for Corporate Reputation242 cited
2001Conducting international marketing research in the twenty‐first century179 cited
1984Response Styles in a Cross-Cultural Managerial Study154 cited
2001Extreme response style in cross‐cultural research114 cited
2003

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Corporate Reputation: An Eight-Country Analysis

111 cited

Cited by

2011RepTrak™ Pulse: Conceptualizing and Validating a Short-Form Measure of Corporate Reputation417 cited
2012Methodological issues in cross-cultural research: An overview and recommendations99 cited
2014The attractiveness of emerging market MNCs as employers of European and American talent workers24 cited