SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Insight into Faculty Open Access Perceptions: A Quantitative Analysis among UAE Faculty
16 references·0 citing·45 second hop
Insight into Faculty Open Access Perceptions: A Quantitative Analysis among UAE Faculty (2022)Insight into Faculty Open Access Percepti…Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review (2021)Profile of authors publishing…Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey (2019)Knowledge and motivations of …Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Problems and challenges of pr…Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals (2016)Peer Review Quality and Trans…University Faculty Awareness and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing and the Institutional Repository: A Case Study (2015)University Faculty Awareness …Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)Who publishes in “predatory” …Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing: A Glance at Generational Differences (2014)Awareness and Attitudes about…Survey Research Methods (2012)Survey Research MethodsThe Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The Development of Open Acces…Open Access Issues and Engineering Faculty Attitudes and Practices (2011)Open Access Issues and Engine…Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines (2010)Assessing the Future Landscap…A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open‐access journal publishing (2010)A longitudinal study of schol…“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers (2010)“Predatory” Open-Access Schol…Factors influencing publication choice: why faculty choose open access (2007)Factors influencing publicati…Exploring the Willingness of Scholars to Accept Open Access: A Grounded Theory Approach (2007)Exploring the Willingness of …Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors (2005)Perceptions of open access pu…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Bias in peer review (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Predatory journals recruit fake editor (2017)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data (2000)Open access publishing takes off (2004)Open Access Publishing and Author-Pays Business Models: A Survey of Authors’ Knowledge and Perceptions (2006)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2020)Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisions (2020)Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study (2004)Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Academics' behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals (2017)Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “Mirror Journal” system (2021)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? (2004)Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles (2006)Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access (2011)The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals (2015)The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)Digital history: a guide to gathering, preserving, and presenting the past on the Web (2006)The shock of the old: technology and global history since 1900 (2007)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research (2018)Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Academia's responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID‐19 (2022)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review (2020)Big data analytics in manufacturing: a bibliometric analysis of research in the field of business management (2021)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process (2020)Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences (2020)Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences (2022)Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysis (2014)Achieving sustainable competitive advantage through product innovation and market driving (2017)The Refined Theory of Basic Values (2017)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009753 cited
  • 2012Survey Research Methods654 cited
  • 2014Who publishes in “predatory” journals?360 cited
  • 2018Problems and challenges of predatory journals227 cited
  • 2010Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines213 cited
  • 2016Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals166 cited
  • 2019Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey154 cited
  • 2005Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors134 cited
  • 2007Factors influencing publication choice: why faculty choose open access122 cited
  • 2014Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing: A Glance at Generational Differences110 cited
  • 2010A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open‐access journal publishing101 cited
  • 2010“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers89 cited
  • 2015University Faculty Awareness and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing and the Institutional Repository: A Case Study83 cited
  • 2021Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

59 cited
  • 2007Exploring the Willingness of Scholars to Accept Open Access: A Grounded Theory Approach59 cited
  • 2011Open Access Issues and Engineering Faculty Attitudes and Practices46 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.