Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The impact of managerial myopia on environmental, social and governance (ESG) engagement: Evidence from Chinese firms

16 references·16 citing·53 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2013Innovation and Institutional Ownership1,947 cited
2013The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation1,593 cited
2016State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics1,217 cited
2022ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors993 cited
2019Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility978 cited
2014Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests909 cited
2021Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice?649 cited
2016Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for a Sustainable Development: An Australian Study643 cited
2017Shaped by their daughters: Executives, female socialization, and corporate social responsibility577 cited
2012Social responsibility in new ventures: profiting from a long‐term orientation571 cited
2015Speaking of the short-term: disclosure horizon and managerial myopia520 cited
2020How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy491 cited
2022Corporate ESG performance and manager misconduct: Evidence from China448 cited
2007Exploring the debate on short‐termism: a theoretical and empirical analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

382 cited

2016Corporate social responsibility and CEO confidence350 cited

2010The Theory and Practice of Myopic Management316 cited

Cited by

2023How does the environmental protection tax law affect firm ESG? Evidence from the Chinese stock markets145 cited
2024The impact of climate change on corporate ESG performance: The role of resource misallocation in enterprises136 cited
2023Can ESG rating reduce corporate carbon emissions? – An empirical study from Chinese listed companies133 cited
2023Striving for sustainable development: Green financial policy, institutional investors, and corporate ESG performance113 cited
2024Is managerial myopia detrimental to corporate ESG performance?66 cited
2023Equity incentives and ESG performance: Evidence from China64 cited
2024ESG systems and financial performance in industries with significant environmental impact: a comprehensive analysis43 cited
2024Is air pollution the original sin of firms? The impact of air pollution on firms' ESG scores41 cited
2024Mandatory disclosure and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China's “explanation for nondisclosure” requirement39 cited
2024How digital leadership guides ESG sustainability39 cited
2023Carbon reduction effect of ESG: empirical evidence from listed manufacturing companies in China38 cited
2024How can organizations measure the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria? Validation of an instrument using item response theory to capture workers' perception38 cited
2024From diversity to sustainability: Environmental and social spillover effects of board gender quotas37 cited
2025Managerial myopia, technological innovation, and greenwashing: Moderating roles of financing constraints and environmental uncertainty37 cited
2023The impact of industrial robot adoption on corporate green innovation in China35 cited
2024How does the green financial system affect environmentally friendly firms' ESG? Evidence from Chinese stock markets32 cited