SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Increased Role of Open Bibliographic Data in the Context of Restricted Access to Proprietary Information Systems
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Increased Role of Open Bibliographic Data in the Context of Restricted Access to Proprietary Information Systems (2023)Increased Role of Open Bibliographic Data…Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scop…The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)The journal coverage of Web o…Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough (2020)Microsoft Academic Graph: Whe…Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data (2020)Dimensions: Bringing down bar…Web of Science and Scopus language coverage (2019)Web of Science and Scopus lan…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)Google Scholar to overshadow …Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation (2018)Dimensions: Building Context …Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? (2018)Dimensions: A competitor to S…Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison (2018)Coverage of highly-cited docu…Construction of the Literature Graph in Semantic Scholar (2018)Construction of the Literatur…The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Google Scholar, Scopus and th…The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)The G oogle scholar experimen…A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)A new approach to the metric …ArnetMiner (2008)ArnetMinerCitation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Gamification in Science Education. A Systematic Review of the Literature (2021)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases (2022)Google Earth Engine: A Global Analysis and Future Trends (2023)Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage (2024)Distributional Structure (1954)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (2013)Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2021)Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 (2023)Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas (2023)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice (2022)Artificial Intelligence in Advertising: Advancements, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations in Targeting, Personalization, Content Creation, and Ad Optimization (2023)The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising (2023)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)S2ORC: The Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus (2020)Data and code for the essay "Recording scientific progress by its content": OpenAlex article counts (2016–2026) and Science Live replication outcomes (2022)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis5,251 cited
  • 2021Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World2,676 cited
  • 2008ArnetMiner2,135 cited
  • 2021The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis2,085 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories1,986 cited
  • 2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison1,783 cited
  • 2010A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator863 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases686 cited
  • 2020Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough513 cited
  • 2019Web of Science and Scopus language coverage388 cited
  • 2018Construction of the Literature Graph in Semantic Scholar345 cited
  • 2018Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation324 cited
  • 2018Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?294 cited
  • 2013The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators271 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data218 cited
  • 2018Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison199 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.