Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

From process to product: writing engagement and performance of EFL learners under computer-generated feedback instruction

16 references·4 citing·51 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2016A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research29,261 cited
2007Research Methods in Education23,507 cited
2015Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches22,104 cited
2001Error feedback in L2 writing classes979 cited
2009Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Second Language Acquisition861 cited
2006The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English803 cited
2011A Corpus‐Based Evaluation of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of College‐Level ESL Writers' Language Development753 cited
2012The Relationship of Lexical Richness to the Quality of ESL Learners’ Oral Narratives526 cited
2013Studies in Corpus Linguistics467 cited
2015Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom433 cited
2010LEARNERS’ PROCESSING, UPTAKE, AND RETENTION OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON WRITING396 cited
2004THE EFFECTS OF PLANNING ON FLUENCY, COMPLEXITY, AND ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGE NARRATIVE WRITING368 cited
2020Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study363 cited
2006Automated writing evaluation: defining the classroom research agenda

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

337 cited

2016The Linguistic Development of Students of English as a Second Language in Two Written Genres320 cited

2008Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes303 cited

Cited by

2025AI-driven language learning in higher education: an empirical study on self-reflection, creativity, anxiety, and emotional resilience in EFL learners29 cited
2025ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool: how students perceive it and how it affects their writing27 cited
2025Exploring the Factors That Promote a Balance Between Academic Integrity and the Effective Use of GenAI Tools in Higher Education: A Systematic Review22 cited
2025Bridging AI and pedagogy: how AI-adaptive feedback shapes Chinese EFL students’ writing engagement, metacognitive writing strategies, and writing performance21 cited