SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence‐based research in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation—Why new studies should rely on earlier work
13 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Evidence‐based research in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation—Why new studies should rely on earlier work (2024)Evidence‐based research in orthopaedics, …Checklists, risk of bias tools, and reporting guidelines for research in orthopedics, sports medicine, and rehabilitation (2023)Checklists, risk of bias tool…Why there is a need to improve evaluation standards for clinical studies in orthopaedic and sports medicine (2022)Why there is a need to improv…Systematic reviews are rarely used to inform study design - a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Systematic reviews are rarely…Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies (2022)Systematic reviews are rarely…Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopaedic clinical trials: a meta-research study (2022)Reporting and transparent res…Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies (2022)Justification of research usi…Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value (2020)Evidence-Based Research Serie…Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important? (2020)Evidence-Based Research Serie…The use of systematic reviews to justify orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials: A cross-sectional analysis (2019)The use of systematic reviews…Towards evidence based research (2016)Towards evidence based resear…Scientific literature: Information overload (2016)Scientific literature: Inform…A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials (2011)A Systematic Examination of t…Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals (1998)Discussion Sections in Report…Minimizing the Three Stages of Publication Bias (1990)Lost Science in the Third World (1995)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting (2010)A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation (2014)The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property (1988)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Tackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James LindInitiative, 2003–2013 (2013)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews – are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? (2016)Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report (2019)Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 3: Using an Evidence-Based Research approach to place your results into context after the study is performed to ensure usefulness of the conclusion (2020)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Barriers and Facilitating Factors for Conducting Systematic Evidence Assessments in Academic Clinical Trials (2021)Digitalising the built environment for all generations: A new paradigm for equity and inclusive age-friendly cities and communities (2023)Meta-Research in Biomedical Investigation: Gaps and Opportunities Based on Meta-Research Publications and Global Indicators in Health, Science, and Human Development (2025)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review (2021)Ten simple rules for good research practice (2022)Leiden manifesto and evidence-based research: Are the appropriate standards being used for the correct evaluation of pluralism, gaps and relevance in medical research? (2024)The scandal of poor medical research (1994)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Author guidelines for conducting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2021)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Improving the reliability of measurements in orthopaedics and sports medicine (2023)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning (2021)The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Scientific literature: Information overload324 cited
  • 1998Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals169 cited
  • 2011A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials151 cited
  • 2020Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?146 cited
  • 2016Towards evidence based research133 cited
  • 2020Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value94 cited
  • 2023Checklists, risk of bias tools, and reporting guidelines for research in orthopedics, sports medicine, and rehabilitation65 cited
  • 2022Systematic reviews are rarely used to inform study design - a systematic review and meta-analysis29 cited
  • 2022Why there is a need to improve evaluation standards for clinical studies in orthopaedic and sports medicine29 cited
  • 2022Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopaedic clinical trials: a meta-research study23 cited
  • 2022Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies19 cited
  • 2022Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies17 cited
  • 2019The use of systematic reviews to justify orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials: A cross-sectional analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

15 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.