SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Generative artificial intelligence and scientific publishing: urgent questions, difficult answers
7 references·5 citing·44 second hop
Generative artificial intelligence and scientific publishing: urgent questions, difficult answers (2024)Generative artificial intelligence and sc…Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis (2024)Publishers’ and journals’ ins…The Rapid Growth of Mega-Journals (2023)The Rapid Growth of Mega-Jour…Postplagiarism: transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology (2023)Postplagiarism: transdiscipli…More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record (2023)More than 10,000 research pap…Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Fighting reviewer fatigue or …Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)Abstracts written by ChatGPT …How should medical science change? (2014)How should medical science ch…Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challenges (2026)Artificial intelligence in sc…When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.192 (2025)When and how to disclose AI u…The role of generative AI in academic and scientific authorship: an autopoietic perspective (2025)The role of generative AI in …Large language models in peer review: challenges and opportunities (2025)Large language models in peer…Generative AI and the future of writing for publication: insights from applied linguistics journal editors (2025)Generative AI and the future …Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals (2016)Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles (2017)Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data (2017)Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)The Janus Effect of Generative AI: Charting the Path for Responsible Conduct of Scholarly Activities in Information Systems (2023)Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth? (2015)Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017 (2018)A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)Embrace responsible ChatGPT usage to overcome language barriers in academic writing (2023)Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics (2023)Evolving patterns of extreme publishing behavior across science (2024)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)Plagiarism in Higher Education (2021)Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Examining academic integrity policy and practice in the era of AI: a case study of faculty perspectives (2025)The ethics of erroneous AI-generated scientific figures (2025)The Impact of AI Guilt on Students’ Use of ChatGPT for Academic Tasks: Examining Disciplinary Differences (2025)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Guidelines for ethical use and acknowledgement of large language models in academic writing (2024)Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals (2024)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Autopoiesis and Cognition (1980)Ecological Communication (1991)Situated Learning (1991)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Research Methods in Education (2017)Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT (2023)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology (2023)The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science (2023)Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2024)Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review (2024)Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists610 cited
  • 2023More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record354 cited
  • 2023Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review268 cited
  • 2024Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis259 cited
  • 2023Postplagiarism: transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology187 cited
  • 2023The Rapid Growth of Mega-Journals84 cited
  • 2014How should medical science change?74 cited

Cited by

  • 2025The role of generative AI in academic and scientific authorship: an autopoietic perspective53 cited
  • 2025When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.19236 cited
  • 2025Generative AI and the future of writing for publication: insights from applied linguistics journal editors22 cited
  • 2025Large language models in peer review: challenges and opportunities15 cited
  • 2026Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challenges13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work