SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scholarly publishing’s hidden diversity: How exclusive databases sustain the oligopoly of academic publishers
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Scholarly publishing’s hidden diversity: How exclusive databases sustain the oligopoly of academic publishers (2025)Scholarly publishing’s hidden diversity: …Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage (2024)Regional disparities in Web o…Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research (2022)Should open access lead to cl…Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process (2022)Recalibrating the scope of sc…Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge (2020)Web of Science and Scopus are…Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study (2020)Multilingual publishing in th…Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data (2020)Dimensions: Bringing down bar…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…Publish or impoverish (2017)Publish or impoverishThe false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics (2016)The false academy: predatory …Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities (2016)Patterns of internationalizat…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…Evaluating big deal journal bundles (2014)Evaluating big deal journal b…Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis (2011)Is Google Scholar useful for …The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)The rate of growth in scienti…The business of academic publishing: A strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing (2008)The business of academic publ…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers,,,, (2000)Free Labor for Costly Journals? (2001)Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature (2018)Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment (2019)In pursuit of open science, open access is not enough (2020)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Mapping of available health research and development data: what's there, what's missing, and what role is there for a global observatory? (2013)Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews (2015)The natural selection of bad science (2016)An introduction to informetrics (1992)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement (2011)The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)Diffusion of eco-innovations: A review (2014)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? (2018)Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation (2018)Exploring machine learning: a scientometrics approach using bibliometrix and VOSviewer (2022)Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals (2022)SciSciNet: A large-scale open data lake for the science of science research (2023)Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus (2009)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Web of Science and Scopus language coverage (2019)Overton: A bibliometric database of policy document citations (2022)A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef (2023)Evaluating the linguistic coverage of OpenAlex : An assessment of metadata accuracy and completeness (2025)China statistical yearbook (1988)The role of transportation speed in facilitating high skilled teamwork across cities (2019)China's catching-up in artificial intelligence seen as a co-evolution of corporate and national innovation systems (2021)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Bibliometric Coloniality in South Africa: Critical Review of the Indexes of Accredited Journals (2024)Gaming the metrics: bibliometric anomalies in global university rankings and the research integrity risk index (RI2) (2025)The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2025)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis5,251 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2010The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index964 cited
  • 2017Publish or impoverish306 cited
  • 2011Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis302 cited
  • 2020Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data218 cited
  • 2024Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage190 cited
  • 2020Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge182 cited
  • 2014Evaluating big deal journal bundles181 cited
  • 2008The business of academic publishing: A strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing164 cited
  • 2016The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics155 cited
  • 2016Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities146 cited
  • 2022Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research120 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study116 cited
  • 2022Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process107 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.