SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The transformative relation between publishers and editors: Research quality and academic autonomy at stake
16 references·0 citing·53 second hop
The transformative relation between publishers and editors: Research quality and academic autonomy at stake (2024)The transformative relation between publi…Predatory publishers’ latest scam: bootlegged and rebranded papers (2021)Predatory publishers’ latest …Global science and national comparisons: beyond bibliometrics and scientometrics (2021)Global science and national c…A multi-scale perspective for assessing publishing circuits in non-hegemonic countries (2021)A multi-scale perspective for…Under-reporting research relevant to local needs in the global south. Database biases in the representation of knowledge on rice (2020)Under-reporting research rele…Predatory journals: Do not judge journals by their Editorial Board Members (2019)Predatory journals: Do not ju…The Norwegian Model in Norway (2018)The Norwegian Model in NorwayCientíficos Periféricos, entre Ariel y Calibán. Saberes Institucionales y Circuitos de Consagración en Argentina: Las Publicaciones de los Investigadores del CONICET (2017)Científicos Periféricos, entr…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…In Search of Academic Quality (2015)In Search of Academic QualityBibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Publishing from the periphery: Structural heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific publications for tenure in Argentina’s CONICET (2014)Publishing from the periphery…Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development (2013)Excellence or quality? Impact…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…El acceso abierto y la división entre ciencia “principal” y “periférica” (2011)El acceso abierto y la divisi…How Professors Think (2009)How Professors ThinkScientific periodicals in Latin America and the Caribbean: a global perspective (1998)Scientific periodicals in Lat…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus (2009)Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution (2010)Introduction: Current tensions and trends in the World Scientific System (2014)Institutional Expansion and Scientific Development in the Periphery: The Structural Heterogeneity of Argentina’s Academic Field (2018)Worlding geography: From linguistic privilege to decolonial anywheres (2021)The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. (1964)The University in Ruins (1997)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Co-existing Notions of Research Quality: A Framework to Study Context-specific Understandings of Good Research (2019)Exploring why global health needs are unmet by research efforts: the potential influences of geography, industry and publication incentives (2020)Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage (2024)Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony (1977)Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches (1995)The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (2004)Strategic Capacity and Organisational Capabilities: A Challenge for Universities (2016)The evaluation of research excellence and the dynamics of knowledge production in the humanities: The case of history in Spain (2018)When Discourse is Hijacked: An Implicit and Performative Resistance Strategy to Gender Equality in Higher Education (2021)Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009 (2012)Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries (2018)National Lists of Scholarly Publication Channels: An Overview and Recommendations for Their Construction and Maintenance (2020)The New Research Assessment Reform in China and Its Implementation (2020)Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research (2021)Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (1978)Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978)A Realist Theory of Science (2013)An evolving international research collaboration network: spatial and thematic developments in co-authored higher education research, 1998–2018 (2022)Hegemony and Inequality in Global Science: Problems of the Center-Periphery Model (2022)Space and scale in higher education: the glonacal agency heuristic revisited (2022)Let’s make peer review scientific (2016)Why do authors publish in predatory journals? (2018)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences (2022)Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation (2022)The future of academic publishing (2023)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Hiring as Cultural Matching (2012)Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation (2012)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2009How Professors Think1,084 cited
  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2013Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development280 cited
  • 2014Publishing from the periphery: Structural heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific publications for tenure in Argentina’s CONICET207 cited
  • 2021Global science and national comparisons: beyond bibliometrics and scientometrics110 cited
  • 2015In Search of Academic Quality94 cited
  • 2018The Norwegian Model in Norway80 cited
  • 2021Predatory publishers’ latest scam: bootlegged and rebranded papers57 cited
  • 1998Scientific periodicals in Latin America and the Caribbean: a global perspective54 cited
  • 2017Científicos Periféricos, entre Ariel y Calibán. Saberes Institucionales y Circuitos de Consagración en Argentina: Las Publicaciones de los Investigadores del CONICET52 cited
  • 2021A multi-scale perspective for assessing publishing circuits in non-hegemonic countries44 cited
  • 2020Under-reporting research relevant to local needs in the global south. Database biases in the representation of knowledge on rice

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

39 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: Do not judge journals by their Editorial Board Members36 cited
  • 2011El acceso abierto y la división entre ciencia “principal” y “periférica”29 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.