SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Lottery before peer review is associated with increased female representation and reduced estimated economic cost in a German funding line
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Lottery before peer review is associated with increased female representation and reduced estimated economic cost in a German funding line (2025)Lottery before peer review is associated …Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Inequities in Receipt of Multiple National Institutes of Health Research Project Grants (2023)Gender, Racial, and Ethnic In…Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty (2023)Gender and retention patterns…Systemic racial disparities in funding rates at the National Science Foundation (2022)Systemic racial disparities i…Racial inequity in grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health (2021)Racial inequity in grant fund…Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)Gender bias in academia: A li…Fund Black scientists (2021)Fund Black scientistsA billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)A billion-dollar donation: es…Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions (2019)Contest models highlight inhe…Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency (2019)Are gender gaps due to evalua…Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications (2018)Low agreement among reviewers…Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems (2018)Funding, evaluation, and the …Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training (2015)Grant Peer Review: Improving …Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands (2015)Gender contributes to persona…On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers (2013)On the time spent preparing g…Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel (2011)Funding grant proposals for s…Fund people not projects (2011)Fund people not projectsA catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce (2014)Knowledge creation in collaboration networks: Effects of tie configuration (2015)Classical peer review: an empty gun (2010)Feminist scholars working around the neoliberal university (2017)Research portfolio analysis and topic prominence (2017)Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. (1989)Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆ (2009)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations (2018)Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation (2019)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data (2007)How Professors Think (2009)Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions (2020)Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians (2000)Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. (2002)The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity (2019)In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity (2020)Intersectional inequalities in science (2022)Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. (2006)Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice (2008)Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards (2011)Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice (2022)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance (1999)The difference: how the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies (2007)Citation inequity and gendered citation practices in contemporary physics (2022)Gender and geographical disparity in editorial boards of journals in psychology and neuroscience (2022)Peer review perpetuates barriers for historically excluded groups (2023)Science Since Babylon (1961)Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education (2022)Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics (1998)The Howard‐Harvard effect: Institutional reproduction of intersectional inequalities (2024)Underrepresented minority faculty in the USA face a double standard in promotion and tenure decisions (2024)THE PEOPLE MAKE THE PLACE (1987)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Sexism in academia is bad for science and a waste of public funding (2023)Closing the scissor-shaped curve: Strategies to promote gender equality in academia (2024)Quantifying attrition in science: a cohort-based, longitudinal study of scientists in 38 OECD countries (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency570 cited
  • 2021Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions364 cited
  • 2021A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review305 cited
  • 2015Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands305 cited
  • 2018Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications210 cited
  • 2023Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty203 cited
  • 2021Racial inequity in grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health185 cited
  • 2011Fund people not projects158 cited
  • 2013On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers157 cited
  • 2022Systemic racial disparities in funding rates at the National Science Foundation155 cited
  • 2021Fund Black scientists143 cited
  • 2011Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel134 cited
  • 2019Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions120 cited
  • 2023Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Inequities in Receipt of Multiple National Institutes of Health Research Project Grants103 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems97 cited
  • 2015Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training86 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.