Artificial Intelligence in Green Marketing: A Systematic Literature Review

Yutao Mei · Linling Geng · Xinwei Cao · Yu Jing Xie

12 citations0/0 files storedSustainability

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Environmental Sustainability in Business AI in Service Interactions Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

Abstract

As environmental sustainability pressures intensify and AI technologies rapidly evolve, the integration of AI into green marketing strategies has become increasingly prominent. This systematic review examines the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in green marketing, with a focus on studies published between 2020 and 2024. This review addresses two key research questions: the effectiveness of different types of artificial intelligence in green marketing applications, and the role of AI in supporting enterprise development in this context. A comprehensive search of SpringerLink, Web of Science, and Google Scholar initially identified 200 records. After duplicate removal and multi-stage screening, 47 articles were deemed to meet the inclusion criteria. Only peer-reviewed journal articles in English were included. Study quality was appraised using established evaluation criteria to ensure methodological rigor. Among these, Thinking AI, Mechanical AI and Feeling AI appeared in 45 studies, 23 studies and 15 studies, respectively. The selected studies span 34 journals and 28 countries, reflecting both the rising academic interest and the interdisciplinary character of this emerging field. However, this review also identifies notable deficiencies in the current body of work. This review integrates these AI types with the 4Ps framework to form a concise conceptual mapping of their respective functions. Although AI has been positioned as a powerful driver of green marketing, research remains fragmented, with limited assessment of AI’s sustainability, weak data and ethical safeguards, and insufficient long-term and global perspectives. This underscores the need for a deeper and more systematic understanding of AI to better achieve the goals of green marketing and improve its practices.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

References

2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses 2004Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises 2005Green marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy?2021Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI 2017“Green Marketing”: An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature 1994An Introduction To Green Marketing 2007Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.