The Equivalence of Direct and Semi-Direct Speaking Tests

Kieran O’Loughlin

62 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Second Language Acquisition and Learning

Abstract

1.Introduction 2. The access: test 3 Methodology 4. Trial 1: The analysis of test scores 5. Trial 1: The analysis of candidate language output 6. Trial 2: The study of test processes7. Trial 2: The analysis of test scores 8. Summary and conclusions

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 62 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2019Language and Subjectivity 2009Comparing Direct and Semi-Direct Modes for Speaking Assessment: Affective Effects on Test Takers 2006Establishing test form and individual task comparability: a case study of a semi-direct speaking test 2004"The Devil Is in the Detail": Researching Gender Issues in Language Assessment 2012Distinguishing features in scoring L2 Chinese speaking performance: How do they work?2015The Relationship Between Listening Proficiency And Speaking Improvement In Higher Education: Considerations In Assessing Speaking And Listening 2013Task Type Effects on Pragmatic Marker Use by Learners at Varying Proficiency Levels 2007Le scénario : une réponse à l’application du CECRL

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.