SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What Can Argumentation Tell Us About Epistemology?
16 references·9 citing·37 second hop
What Can Argumentation Tell Us About Epistemology? (2007)What Can Argumentation Tell Us About Epis…Personal epistemology the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (2009)Personal epistemology the psy…Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry (2005)Understanding students' pract…The Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations (2005)The Quality of Students' Use …TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse (2004)TAPping into argumentation: D…The Uses of Argument (2003)The Uses of ArgumentConceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations (2003)Conceptual and Epistemic Aspe…Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science (2002)Views of nature of science qu…Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education (2002)Supporting and Promoting Argu…Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing (2002)Epistemic levels in argument:…Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE (2000)Scientific arguments as learn…Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms (2000)Establishing the norms of sci…?Doing the lesson? or ?doing science?: Argument in high school genetics (2000)?Doing the lesson? or ?doing …Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking (1993)Science as argument: Implicat…Reasoning in Conversation (1993)Reasoning in ConversationScience in Action (1987)Science in ActionA Handbook of Child Psychology (1932)A Handbook of Child PsychologyFinding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and Whole Science (2020)Finding the place of argument…Argumentation, critical thinking, nature of science and socioscientific issues: a dialogue between two researchers (2018)Argumentation, critical think…Students’ understandings of nature of science and their arguments in the context of four socio-scientific issues (2017)Students’ understandings of n…Key challenges and future directions for educational research on scientific argumentation (2017)Key challenges and future dir…Developing pre-service teachers' evidence-based argumentation skills on socio-scientific issues (2014)Developing pre-service teache…The Use and Effectiveness of an Argumentation and Evaluation Intervention in Science Classes (2013)The Use and Effectiveness of …Reasoning using particulate nature of matter: An example of a sociochemical norm in a university-level physical chemistry class (2012)Reasoning using particulate n…The Nature of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-oriented Laboratory Context (2011)The Nature of Pre-service Sci…Elementary children's judgments of the epistemic status of sources of justification (2010)Elementary children's judgmen…Time and modality (1957)The interdisciplinary study of coordination (1994)Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research (2001)The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1 (2006)THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING * (1976)Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning (1989)National Science Education Standards (1995)Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals (2008)Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science (2008)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The consequences of modernity (1990)Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science (2004)Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research (2004)Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change (1982)Apprenticeship in Thinking (1990)Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context (1990)Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design (1999)Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials (2006)Talking science: language, learning, and values (1991)Situated Learning (1991)Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. (1994)Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom (2005)Educational Research: An Introduction (1984)What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community (2003)Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report (2014)Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation (2000)The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work (2000)Handbook of Positive Psychology (2001)Understanding Student Differences (2005)Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning (2006)Teacher beliefs and technology integration (2012)Governing economic life (1990)Chapter 3 : Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education (2000)Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact (2001)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1932A Handbook of Child Psychology10,101 cited
  • 2003The Uses of Argument7,099 cited
  • 1987Science in Action4,089 cited
  • 2000Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms2,328 cited
  • 2002Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science1,912 cited
  • 2009Personal epistemology the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing1,644 cited
  • 2004TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse1,406 cited
  • 2002Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education1,162 cited
  • 2000?Doing the lesson? or ?doing science?: Argument in high school genetics1,023 cited
  • 1993Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking918 cited
  • 2005Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry771 cited
  • 2000Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE653 cited
  • 2005The Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations632 cited
  • 2003Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations458 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2002
Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing
434 cited
  • 1993Reasoning in Conversation358 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Key challenges and future directions for educational research on scientific argumentation124 cited
    • 2011The Nature of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-oriented Laboratory Context105 cited
    • 2012Reasoning using particulate nature of matter: An example of a sociochemical norm in a university-level physical chemistry class100 cited
    • 2017Students’ understandings of nature of science and their arguments in the context of four socio-scientific issues98 cited
    • 2014Developing pre-service teachers' evidence-based argumentation skills on socio-scientific issues96 cited
    • 2010Elementary children's judgments of the epistemic status of sources of justification91 cited
    • 2020Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and Whole Science76 cited
    • 2013The Use and Effectiveness of an Argumentation and Evaluation Intervention in Science Classes67 cited
    • 2018Argumentation, critical thinking, nature of science and socioscientific issues: a dialogue between two researchers67 cited