SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Poor-Quality Medical Research
13 references·2 citing·41 second hop
Poor-Quality Medical Research (2002)Poor-Quality Medical ResearchDiscussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals (2002)Discussion Sections in Report…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing (1999)How can medical journals help…Clinical Epidemiological Quality in Molecular Genetic Research (1999)Clinical Epidemiological Qual…Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals (1998)Statistical reviewing policie…Freedom and Responsibility in Medical Publication (1998)Freedom and Responsibility in…Putting trials on trial--the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of methodology. (1997)Putting trials on trial--the …Pardonable revisions and protocol reviews (1997)Pardonable revisions and prot…The scandal of poor medical research (1994)The scandal of poor medical r…The Performance of Peer Review and a Beauty Contest of Referee Processes of Economics Journals (2005)The Performance of Peer Revie…The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers (2003)The editorial process for med…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research (2002)Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study (2005)Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis (2005)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1998)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Trying to do more Good than Harm in Policy and Practice: The Role of Rigorous, Transparent, Up-to-Date Evaluations (2003)Monitoring global health: time for new solutions (2004)Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports (2004)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good (1995)Local Literature Bias in Genetic Epidemiology: An Empirical Evaluation of the Chinese Literature (2005)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA): An Extension of the STROBE Statement (2009)A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION (1960)Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness (1967)A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to Change (1979)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 2: Randomized Controlled Trials (2008)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 4: Observational Studies (2009)No short-cut in assessing trial quality: a case study (2009)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Educational Research, Policymaking and Practice (2002)The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews (2013)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 1994The scandal of poor medical research897 cited
  • 1999Clinical Epidemiological Quality in Molecular Genetic Research175 cited
  • 1997Putting trials on trial--the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of methodology.130 cited
  • 2002Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals125 cited
  • 1999How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing114 cited
  • 1998Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals94 cited
  • 1998Freedom and Responsibility in Medical Publication60 cited
  • 1997Pardonable revisions and protocol reviews31 cited

Cited by

  • 2003The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

15 cited
  • 2005The Performance of Peer Review and a Beauty Contest of Referee Processes of Economics Journals11 cited