NESB and ESB students' attitudes and perceptions of plagiarism

Stephen James Marshall · Maryanne Garry

106 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal for Educational Integrity

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Legal Issues in Education Educational Strategies and Epistemologies

Abstract

Concern about plagiarism by students from non-English speaking backgrounds (NESB) has grown apace with the increased numbers of international students attending western institutions. We present an exploration of student attitudes, perceptions and understandings of intellectual property, particularly plagiarism and copyright, and explore potential differences between NESB and ESB (English speaking background) students. The results indicate that while NESB students are more likely have engaged in plagiarism than ESB students, plagiarism overall is very common and reflects a combination of disrespect for material from the Internet and significant confusion about what actually constitutes plagiarism.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 106 citations exist upstream.

References

1996The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological, and Contextual Influences.2003In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons 1996Borrowing Others' Words: Text, Ownership, Memory, and Plagiarism 2002Teaching the Chinese learner: psychological and pedagogical perspectives 1995Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty 2000Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students 2001Teaching the Chinese Learner: Psychological and Pedagogical Perspectives 1998Learning from the Literature on Collegiate Cheating: A Review of Empirical Research

Cited by

2018Paraphrasing tools, language translation tools and plagiarism: an exploratory study 2017Perceptions of and Attitudes toward Plagiarism and Factors Contributing to Plagiarism: a Review of Studies 2010Weeds in the flower garden: An exploration of plagiarism in graduate students' research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors 2022What are Automated Paraphrasing Tools and how do we address them? A review of a growing threat to academic integrity

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.