Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A survey of assessor beliefs and practices related to faking

16 references·16 citing·50 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1977Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?1,081 cited
1996Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.924 cited
1990Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities.849 cited
1999Meta-Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement529 cited
1998The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions.486 cited
1995Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews.471 cited
1993The Big Five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations.417 cited
2000Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.409 cited
2011Assessment, Measurement, and Prediction for Personnel Decisions406 cited
1994Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors.369 cited
1991Personality and personality measurement.349 cited
2002The use of impression management tactics in structured interviews: A function of question type?293 cited
2000On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples.271 cited
2005Reconsidering Forced-Choice Item Formats for Applicant Personality Assessment

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

250 cited

2000The Impact of Faking on Employment Tests: Does Forced Choice Offer a Solution?233 cited

1997Assessment, Measurement, and Prediction for Personnel Decisions216 cited

Cited by

2014Honest and Deceptive Impression Management in the Employment Interview: Can It Be Detected and How Does It Impact Evaluations?136 cited
2014Interviewers' perceptions of impression management in employment interviews108 cited
2015A dynamic model of applicant faking108 cited
2014Shall we continue or stop disapproving of self-presentation? Evidence on impression management and faking in a selection context and their relation to job performance74 cited
2015A Meta‐Analytic Multitrait Multirater Separation of Substance and Style in Social Desirability Scales62 cited
2017The Goldwater Rule: Perspectives From, and Implications for, Psychological Science48 cited
2012Applicants’ Self-Presentational Behavior46 cited
2018Effects of Applicant Faking on Forced-Choice and Likert Scores40 cited
2016Cross‐Cultural Differences in Applicant Faking on Personality Tests: A 43‐Nation Study38 cited
2015Cross-Cultural Differences in the Attitude Toward Applicants’ Faking in Job Interviews35 cited
2010The Amazing Diversity of Thought: A Qualitative Study on How Human Resource Practitioners Perceive Selection Procedures32 cited
2012Deception and Applicant Faking: Putting the Pieces Together19 cited
2021An updated survey of beliefs and practices related to faking in individual assessments13 cited
2015Personality testing in personnel selection: Love it? Leave it? Understand it!11 cited
2006EFFECTS OF PERCEIVED SELECTION RATIO ON PERSONALITY TEST FAKING8 cited
2015Applicants' Strategic Use of Extreme or Midpoint Responses When Faking Personality Tests6 cited