Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Ethical evaluations, intentions, and orientations of accountants: Evidence from a cross-cultural examination

16 references·2 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1990Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of Business Ethics697 cited
2012Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics634 cited
2010International Federation Of Accountants427 cited
1990Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character? Evidence from Europe and the United States381 cited
1988Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethical evaluations of marketing activities360 cited
2012Some Initial Steps Toward Improving the Measurement of Ethical Evaluations of Marketing Activities357 cited
1986Comparative and multinational management331 cited
1991Professional ethics: Business students' perceptions245 cited
1992The Globalization of Business Ethics: Why America Remains Distinctive221 cited
1992Business ethics judgments: A cross-cultural comparison208 cited
1991A cross-cultural comparison of the ethics of business students201 cited
1992A Multidimensional Analysis of Selected Ethical Issues in Accounting.173 cited
1993A validation and extension of a multidimensional ethics scale171 cited
1987Business ethics: A cross-cultural comparison of managers' attitudes169 cited
1992

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cultural and socioeconomic constraints on international codes of ethics: Lessons from accounting

161 cited

1994A Cross‐cultural Study of Moral Philosophies, Ethical Perceptions and Judgements150 cited

Cited by

2008Are students from different business majors predisposed to different ethical sensitivities9 cited
2009Ethical Decision Making: Panama–United States Differences in Consumer and Marketing Contexts7 cited