Human Resource Management and the Industrial Relations Tradition

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic overview of the existing literature on HRM and industrial relations in both the United States and Britain. It examines the assumptions in the U.S. literature and the British critique of those assumptions. It concludes that HRM is not uniformly anti-union; is complementary to industrial relations and cannot supplant it.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 40 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.