Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Common comparison standards: An approach to improving agreement between self and supervisory performance ratings.

16 references·16 citing·39 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1965Inequity In Social Exchange10,813 cited
1996Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.6,899 cited
1963Towards an understanding of inequity.5,146 cited
1987Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior3,713 cited
1988A META‐ANALYSIS OF SELF‐SUPERVISOR, SELF‐PEER, AND PEER‐SUPERVISOR RATINGS1,080 cited
1982Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis.973 cited
1981Increasing Productivity through Performance Appraisal768 cited
1984Performance appraisal : assessing human behavior at work622 cited
1987Behind the Mask: The Politics of Employee Appraisal560 cited
1991Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective.479 cited
1984A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions444 cited
1974An examination of referents used in the evaluation of pay367 cited
1983The Measurement of Work Performance: Methods, Theory, and Applications322 cited
1981The relative accuracy of self-predictions and judgments by others in psychological assessment.293 cited
1992Personal and Situational Determinants of Referent Choice278 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1996Comparing correlated but nonoverlapping correlations.262 cited

Cited by

2004Perceived fairness of web‐based applicant screening procedures: Weighing the rules of justice and the role of individual differences99 cited
2019State-of-the-science review of leader-follower dyads research77 cited
2002Cognitive and GMA Testing in the European Community: Issues and Evidence75 cited
2006A Field Study of the Role of Big Five Personality in Applicant Perceptions of Selection Fairness, Self, and the Hiring Organization69 cited
2003Applicant Perceptions of Selection Procedures: The Role of Selection Information, Belief in Tests, and Comparative Anxiety68 cited
2007Understanding Frequent Switching Patterns64 cited
2009Supervisor–subordinate convergence in descriptions of leader–member exchange (LMX) quality: Review and testable propositions62 cited
2007Subjectivity in the Appraisal Process: A Facilitator of Gender Bias in Work Settings59 cited
2003Attitudes Towards Personnel Selection Methods: A Partial Replication and Extension in a German Sample57 cited
2004The Impact of Selection Encounters on Applicants: An Experimental Study into Feedback Effects after a Negative Selection Decision53 cited
2004Job‐Seeker Reactions to Selection Process Information in Job Ads52 cited
2013Comparing Employees and Managers’ Perceptions of Organizational Learning, Health, and Work Performance30 cited
2000Factors Affecting the Convergence of Self-Peer Ratings on Contextual and Task Performance29 cited
2007Understanding Frequent Switching Patterns A Crucial Element in Managing Customer Relationships28 cited
2007Test‐Taker Reactions to the Selection Process: Effects of Outcome Favorability, Explanations, and Voice on Fairness Perceptions26 cited
2004Do Procedural Justice Perceptions in a Selection Testing Context Predict Applicant Attraction and Intention Toward the Organization?25 cited