Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Sentencing and public confidence: Results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing

10 references·7 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1993What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications.8,803 cited
2006Why People Obey the Law5,146 cited
2005Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation2,384 cited
2003Penal Populism and Public Opinion Lessons from Five Countries465 cited
2005Beyond populist punitiveness?190 cited
2000Building a Law-Abiding Society: Taking Public Views About Morality and the Legitimacy of Legal Authorities into Account When Formulating Substantive Law172 cited
2005Public Opinion Versus Public Judgment About Crime104 cited
2008The Utility of Desert96 cited
2007Predicting Punitive Attitudes in Australia91 cited
2014Penal populism, sentencing councils and sentencing policy75 cited

Cited by

2011Using Jurors to Explore Public Attitudes to Sentencing52 cited
2013Just interests: Victims, citizens and the potential for justice40 cited
2019Problem-Solving Courts in Australia: A Review of Problems and Solutions32 cited
2015Predicting punitive attitudes to sentencing: Does the public's perceptions of crime and Indigenous Australians matter?22 cited
2016Measuring jurors’ views on sentencing: Results from the second Australian jury sentencing study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

22 cited

2013Reconsidering predictors of punitiveness in Australia: A test of four theories18 cited

2017Locating the Judge within Sentencing Research16 cited