SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Double-Blind Refereeing
16 references·3 citing·42 second hop
Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Double-Blind Refereeing (1993)Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Double-…The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial (1990)The effects of blinding on th…Reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist: A biostatistical assessment of the data. (1980)Reliability of reviews for th…Manuscript characteristics influencing reviewers' decisions. (1980)Manuscript characteristics in…Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments. (1978)Evaluating psychological rese…Editorial Policies and Practices Among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields (1978)Editorial Policies and Practi…Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Publication prejudices: An ex…Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal Publication in Three Scientific Disciplines (1977)Paradigm Development and Part…Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)Peer review in biomedical pub…Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. (1974)Interreferee agreement on som…The Ortega Hypothesis (1972)The Ortega HypothesisImproving manuscript evaluation procedures. (1972)Improving manuscript evaluati…Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Patterns of evaluation in sci…Stratification in American Science* (1970)Stratification in American Sc…Psychology of Scientist: XXX. Credibility of Psychologists: An Empirical Study (1970)Psychology of Scientist: XXX.…The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Matthew effect in science…Are women prejudiced against women? (1968)Are women prejudiced against …Incentives for Research Effort: An Evolutionary Model of Publication Markets with Double-Blind and Open Review (2022)Incentives for Research Effor…Blind Peer Review by Academic Journals (2016)Blind Peer Review by Academic…The false ‘Ortega Hypothesis’: a literature science case study (2004)The false ‘Ortega Hypothesis’…The Revolt of the Masses (1932)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science (1967)Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. (1997)Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. (2003)What Causes a Management Article to be Cited—Article, Author, or Journal? (2007)Social Theory and Social Structure. (1958)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Effect of Uncertainty on the Use of Social Influence in Organizational Decision Making (1976)The Role of Mentors in the Career Development of Young Professionals (1987)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)The Scientific Community. (1966)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The subjective side of science (1975)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable (1993)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2002)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Editorial: Some Remarks From the Outgoing Editor. (1982)Evidence for consciousness-related anomalies in random physical systems (1989)We Have to Break Up (2009)The American Psychological Association (1919)Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1971)Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders (1975)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Toward an Integration of Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives on Social Inference: A Biased Hypothesis-Testing Model (1987)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. (1998)Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. (1998)Field Experiments on Discrimination (2016)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)The Science of Reviewing Researcha (1993)Assessing “Best Evidence”: Issues in Grading the Quality of Studies for Systematic Reviews (1999)Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta‐analyses (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
  • 1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
  • 1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
  • 1968Are women prejudiced against women?627 cited
  • 1972The Ortega Hypothesis387 cited
  • 1978Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments.257 cited
  • 1974Peer review in biomedical publication241 cited
  • 1978Editorial Policies and Practices Among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields226 cited
  • 1990The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial216 cited
  • 1970Stratification in American Science*210 cited
  • 1977Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal Publication in Three Scientific Disciplines197 cited
  • 1980Manuscript characteristics influencing reviewers' decisions.182 cited
  • 1974Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.169 cited
  • 1980Reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist: A biostatistical assessment of the data.160 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1972Improving manuscript evaluation procedures.159 cited
  • 1970Psychology of Scientist: XXX. Credibility of Psychologists: An Empirical Study139 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Incentives for Research Effort: An Evolutionary Model of Publication Markets with Double-Blind and Open Review20 cited
    • 2016Blind Peer Review by Academic Journals13 cited
    • 2004The false ‘Ortega Hypothesis’: a literature science case study13 cited