Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

What works and what doesn't: Evaluation beyond kirkpatrick

2 references·16 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1989KIRKPATRICK'S LEVELS OF TRAINING CRITERIA: THIRTY YEARS LATER722 cited
1974Evaluation and control of training291 cited

Cited by

2021Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers126 cited
2009Trainees' reactions to training: an analysis of the factors affecting overall satisfaction with training112 cited
2021The Kirkpatrick model for training evaluation: bibliometric analysis after 60 years (1959–2020)111 cited
1998Kirkpatrick plus: Evaluation and continuous improvement with a community focus91 cited
2010Are we doing the right thing?68 cited
2003They’re Happy, but Did They Make a Difference? Applying Kirkpatrick’s Framework to the Evaluation of a National Leadership Program59 cited
1998Needs assessment—a digest, review, and comparison of needs assessment literature47 cited
2010Trainees' reactions to training: shaping groups and courses for happier trainees46 cited
2002Dimensions and design criteria for developing training reaction evaluations29 cited
2010Did you learn something useful today? An analysis of how perceived utility relates to perceived learning and their predictiveness of satisfaction with training29 cited
2012SOAP‐M: a training evaluation model for HR24 cited
2014

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Training Evaluation

23 cited

2017Training abroad and technological capacity building: Analysing the role of Chinese training and scholarship programmes for Tanzanians20 cited

2000Getting serious about results and payoffs: We are what we say, do, and deliver19 cited

1999Effectiviteit van werkplek-opleidingen17 cited

2008Evaluation of Corporate Training Programs: Perspectives and Issues for Further Research16 cited