DOES NATIONAL CULTURE OR AMBIENT TEMPERATURE EXPLAIN CROSS-NATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN ROLE STRESS? NO SWEAT!

Mark F. Peterson · Peter B. Smith

86 citations0/0 files storedAcademy of Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Cultural Differences and Values Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Global and Cross-Cultural Management

Abstract

Van de Vliert and Van Yperen's (1996) proposal that ambient temperature explains the relationship between national cultural values and typical levels of role stress is reevaluated. The provisional conclusion is that the effect of ambient temperature on role stress is largely mediated by its contribution to the historical evolution of cultural values.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 86 citations exist upstream.

References

1983Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.1995Institutions and organizations 2017The Motivation to Work 1988The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth 1986International dimensions of organizational behavior 1985A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings 1987Chinese Values and the Search for Culture-Free Dimensions of Culture 1995Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations.

Cited by

2002Technology-based competitive strategies 2004A Critical Review of Epistemological and Methodological Issues in Cross-Cultural Research 2000Cognitive Aspects of Decision-Making: Project Summary

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.