Explaining buyers' responses to sellers' violation of trust

Sijun Wang · Lenard C. Huff

114 citations0/0 files storedEuropean Journal of Marketing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Customer Service Quality and Loyalty Service and Product Innovation Corporate Identity and Reputation

Abstract

Purpose This study seeks to explain a buyer's response to a seller's violation of trust. Four negative responses (decline in trust, negative emotions, negative word‐of‐mouth (WOM) and reduction in repurchase intentions) and four explanatory variables (magnitude of violation, integrity versus capability‐based cause of failure, perceived likelihood of repeated violations and stage of trust prior to the violation) were identified. The study develops and tests hypotheses regarding the possible influence of the explanatory variables on each of the four negative responses. Design/methodology/approach An experiment was conducted in which business professionals were given one of 16 scenarios, varied by levels of the four explanatory variables, describing a violation of trust in a business‐to‐business service situation. Respondents were asked questions regarding their probable response. Four‐way ANCOVA was used to analyze the results. Findings The study finds that stage of trust and perceived likelihood of repeated violation had significant main effects on decline in trust, negative WOM and repurchase intentions. Integrity‐based attribution influenced decline in trust, but magnitude of violation had no main effects. Three significant interactions were found. Research limitations/implications Findings show the importance of first impressions and reputation. Care should be taken to assure customers that violations will not be repeated. A major limitation was that scenarios cannot induce the same intensity of thought and emotion that real situations do. Originality/value Despite extensive literature in service failure and recovery, this is perhaps the first study to rigorously examine and seek to explain a buyer's response to a seller's violation of trust.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 114 citations exist upstream.

References

1991The theory of planned behavior 1975Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research 1994The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing 1969Attachment and Loss 1968Identity : Youth and Crisis. 1968 1995An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust 1972Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment 1995AFFECT- AND COGNITION-BASED TRUST AS FOUNDATIONS FOR INTERPERSONAL COOPERATION IN ORGANIZATIONS.

Cited by

2017The Effect of a Data Breach Announcement on Customer Behavior: Evidence from a Multichannel Retailer 2010Evaluating Customer Information Breaches as Service Failures: An Event Study Approach 2015Trust violation and repair: The information privacy perspective 2016Birds of a feather: intra-industry spillover of the Target customer data breach and the shielding role of IT, marketing, and CSR 2016Trust Recovery Following a Double Deviation 2020A signaling theory approach to relationship recovery

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.