SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Overclaiming Questionnaire: A good way to measure faking? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleThe Overclaiming Questionnaire: A good way to measure faking?

Justin R. Feeney2015

Article2015

The Overclaiming Questionnaire: A good way to measure faking?

Justin R. Feeney · Richard D. Goffin

37 citations·0/0 files stored·Personality and Individual Differences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

References

1992A power primer.1980Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix.1999A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models 2002Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives.2003The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability.2001UNDERSTANDING WORK USING THE OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION NETWORK (O*NET): IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH 2000Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.2010Rethinking Social Desirability Scales

Cited by

2017Teasing Apart Overclaiming, Overconfidence, and Socially Desirable Responding 2016Openness to (reporting) experiences that one never had: Overclaiming as an outcome of the knowledge accumulated through a proclivity for cognitive and aesthetic exploration.2021Is social desirability bias important for effective ethics research? A review of literature 2021Predictors of faking behavior on personality inventories in selection: Do indicators of the ability and motivation to fake predict faking?

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2019Liar! Liar! (when stakes are higher): Understanding how the overclaiming technique can be used to measure faking in personnel selection.article · 9 shared references 2012Deception and Applicant Faking: Putting the Pieces Togetherchapter · 7 shared references 2018Effects of Applicant Faking on Forced-Choice and Likert Scoresarticle · 6 shared references 2021A Meta-Analysis of the Faking Resistance of Forced-Choice Personality Inventoriesreview · 6 shared references 2022Valence, Instrumentality, Expectancy, and Ability as Determinants of Faking, and the Effects of Faking on Criterion-Related Validityarticle · 6 shared references 2017Not Aggressive or Just Faking It? Examining Faking and Faking Detection on the Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggressionarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2015

Typearticle

Published2015-03-30

VenuePersonality and Individual Differences

ISSN-L0191-8869

Languageen

Citations37

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPsychological Testing and Assessment

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.038

openalex_workW2053328082

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2022

Applicant faking warnings: Are they really effective?

2023Evaluation of warning strategies to reduce faking during military recruitment

2025Learning More Than You Can Know: Introductory Education Produces Overly Expansive Self-Assessments of Knowledge