Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Interactions Between Jurors as a Function of Majority vs. Unanimity Decision Rules

4 references·16 citing·52 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1951Deviation, rejection, and communication.1,165 cited
1971Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process616 cited
1975The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules.212 cited
1959The University of Chicago Jury Project95 cited

Cited by

1987Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule.427 cited
2010Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity.381 cited
1984Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research.270 cited
1987Minority Influence, Divergent Thinking and Detection of Correct Solutions230 cited
1995Dissent as Driving Cognition, Attitudes, and Judgments206 cited
1983Decision development in small groups, III: A multiple sequence model of group decision development190 cited
1979The Psychology of Group Processes155 cited
1981Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.152 cited
2014Gender Inequality in Deliberation: Unpacking the Black Box of Interaction112 cited
2014Deliberation and disagreement107 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2009

Creative consensus on interpretations of qualitative data: The Ward method

97 cited

2010Should We Aim for Consensus?94 cited

2020Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform Governance90 cited

1993Psychological entrapment in group decision making: An assigned decision rule and a groupthink phenomenon.83 cited

1991Procedural influence in small-group decision making: Deliberation style and assigned decision rule.69 cited

2010The promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation62 cited