References

• 1991The theory of planned behavior90,729 cited
• 2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.81,863 cited
• 1992A power primer.42,571 cited
• 1964CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*19,431 cited
• 1995The Theory of the Growth of the Firm13,774 cited
• 1977Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys12,220 cited
• 1996Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance10,148 cited
• 1973The nature of human values10,141 cited
• 1990Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications7,320 cited
• 1999Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies7,307 cited
• 1975THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS**This paper is another in a series of interrelated theoretical and statistical studies of corporate financial and investment policies being made under grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, and more recently the Ford Foundation, to the Harvard Business School. The generous support for this work is most gratefully acknowledged. The author is also much indebted to his colleagues Professors Bishop, Christenson, Kahr, Raiffa, and (especially) Schlaifer, for extensive discussion and commentary on an earlier draft of this paper; but responsibility for any errors or imperfections remains strictly his own.[Professor Sharpe's paper, “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk” (Journal of Finance, September 1964) appeared after this paper was in final form and on its way to the printers. My first section, which parallels the first half of his paper (with corresponding conclusions), sets the algebraic framework for sections II, III and VI, (which have no counterpart in his paper) and for section IV on the equilibrium prices of risk assets, concerning which our results differ significantly for reasons which will be explored elsewhere. Sharpe does not take up the capital budgeting problem developed in section V below.]